As a general rule of thumb, adjectives are minor league. “Rays” is so much better than “Devil Rays,” and “Ducks” infinitely preferable to “Mighty Ducks.” Trademark issues obviously stand in the way, but I can see a future where they drop the “Golden” and everyone is better off for it.
THEY CAN’T MAKE US PLAY. JUST SAY NO.
As a Jets fan, I welcome this news. Actually, could you see if they could flex it more? How about 2 a.m. on a Wednesday? Is it possible to flex a game to never? I vote for never. Put it on the other side of Trump’s stupid wall.
I have no stake in this game whatsoever, but this YouTube Zapruder film somebody shot off their TV is giving me life.
I hope all three guys get extended time this season. Playing Petty at some point seems especially wise, since he’s under contract for next year at a cheap price. While I can’t defend the Hackenberg pick, I’m also of the opinion that redshirting him is essentially delaying the inevitable and could delay them pursuing…
God it would be hilarious if that’s the closest we ever get.
The charitable version: In a lot of ways, the Jets put him in a really hard situation to succeed. Going from the spread system he ran in college to the very different and complex system Marty Mornhinweg was running was no easy transition. Ideally, Geno would have sat for a while, but Rex Ryan stupidly played Mark…
There is currently raging within #JetsTwitter a truly depressing and heated debate between Fitz loyalists, who somehow believe the statistical worst quarterback in football so far this season is being scapegoated; Geno stans, who defend his two full seasons of futility as attributable entirely to a truly bad…
I think he’s preparing for the landslide loss to Hillary...
Agreed.
They’re definitely not a good advertising market, so he’d probably have to hope they can cough up $7 or so a month for a subscription.
Oh 100 percent. It would definitely have to be a subscription-based model. “The classiest and most luxurious news for only $7.99/mo. It’s yuuuuge!”
There’s definitely some truth to this. Trump’s candidacy has become a remarkable litmus test for sorting out the crazies and racists that had been hiding in plain sight in day-to-day life, as well as the most craven and self-interested among conservative media figures and politicians.
Has been said before, but bears repeating:
...the presumption that Clinton would lose a hypothetical race against Trump seems flawed to me for several reasons:
Setting aside your assertion that she’s “barely eking it out” currently, while leading in every single swing state and by several points in national polling averages, the presumption that Clinton would lose a hypothetical race against Trump seems flawed to me for several reasons:
If you think a 1.5 or 2 percent improvement in the national polling average this close to election day is “minuscule,” then you frankly don’t know what you’re talking about. I’ll be charitable and presume you’re just making a dishonest argument while grasping at straws instead.
Sigh. Buddy.... no difference? What alternate reality are you living in? She’s up from her pre-debate position in essentially every single national and swing state poll taken since the debate.
The worst-case scenario going forward would be for Watkins and the Bills to fall into “there’s a difference between hurt and injured” trap. If he spends the next 14 weeks of the season flitting in and out of the lineup while never being healthy enough to produce or hurt enough to justify a full shut down, nobody’s…
Nah, the main point here is this: We don’t know for sure yet what impact the debate has had on this election, or Clinton’s support, simply because most polls take several days to complete. Thankfully, not as long as the “daily” LA Times poll that was the entire basis for your argument.
