michaelberglund
OORC
michaelberglund

Her problem is that while she has a great point to make, her arguments are indefensible due to errors and strawman arguments.

Deal breaker right there. Cancelled pre-order and voted 1 star on every site.

Wrong you do need it, it is required or were you not listening to MS?

Totally Agree with you on that matter, I've been saying this for years.

No one Cares about the developers or the publishers or the cost it takes to hire voice actors, programers, PR people, Janitors, etc etc etc.

In my experience, no one will truly understand unless they've been in the industry before or understand the

Let me make a single distinction that destroys the possibility of comparison between video games and every other medium:

I mean, legally speaking, customers should know what they're buying. Something on the box, even in a small area on the back maybe, that says "online pass required for online play" is enough.

EA doesn't sell their own games used. So why would it be EA's responsibility to inform customers on the front of packages. After all, they are all bought new at one point so a label would seem kind of stupid for a new purchase.

Question of the day: If you own a Wii U, why? If you do not own a Wii U, what would it take to convince you to buy one?

It'd be nice if people didn't start criticizing Sarkeesian here. I'm sure they will, but... it would be nice. Not to say she doesn't deserve criticism, just that I'm tired of seeing a bunch of petty white knights show up to discount everything anyone says against her, especially stuff that's actually valid.

I believe pointing out a numerical error leads people to believe that she is sensationalizing and not actually doing proper research.

I reluctantly agree. If she present all of the facts and come to the conclusion, I would be applauding her effort. However, she only point out the things that fits her narrative, making the whole thing very hard to watch. While I agree with her topic and goal, but her argument makes this video quite bad.

Nah. The worst thing around this hoo-haa was when people leaked her personal info and threatened her with rape and murder. The second worst thing is that it's the 21st century and the industry still hasn't come close to fixing its problems. Way down the list is the risk to your image, and as other people have said

Even though to me Infinite is GOTY, ( I am a massive BioShock fanboy) thank you for saying it is your opinion. I hate when people exclaim their opinions as facts.

BREAKING: Xbox One is a toaster

Riot bears some of the blame for this. You have Riot folks like Morello who straight up talk about how they want to make it harder to punish people who step out of position - whether that's with stronger towers, or fewer hard disables or slows.

I dont know what im looking at. But I think if I did. It would blow my mind.

They're both guilty. Marcus Beer is a cancer for allowing his behavior, to be his "excuse" for what he does. It's bullying plain and simple, and the difference is this - Phil Fish is 1 of 2 people in a privately owned company. They have no massive staff, they have no HR, they have no "representative" that is an expert

Avatar baSed Sexual assault PrEveNtIon and reSponse training.

The "one player at a time" angle is an interesting one and seems like the only feasible way to go about it. I'm a bit torn on it though.