1-10-NYG 37 (14:00) (Shotgun) E.Manning pass short right to O.Beckham to NYG 41 for 4 yards (G.Quin).
1-10-NYG 37 (14:00) (Shotgun) E.Manning pass short right to O.Beckham to NYG 41 for 4 yards (G.Quin).
How many games have resulted in a team using both challenges in a game? It hardly happens. Now that’s add how often a team needs to use a third challenge. Even slimmer. Using a challenge on a play that you will clearly win is always the correct answer.
No I’m not! I’m using reality. The officials made a mistake. That’s why you challenge. A 2nd and 6 is a whole different situation than a 2nd and 10. Obviously the Giants drove down the field and scored. So we know the result of not challenging. I’m not saying the same result wouldn’t have happened had he challenged.…
1-10-NYG 37 (14:00) (Shotgun) E.Manning pass short right to O.Beckham to NYG 41 for 4 yards (G.Quin).
1-10-NYG 37 (14:00) (Shotgun) E.Manning pass short right to O.Beckham to NYG 41 for 4 yards (G.Quin).
1-10-NYG 37 (14:00) (Shotgun) E.Manning pass short right to O.Beckham to NYG 41 for 4 yards (G.Quin).
You literally said there is no risk of losing the challenge. I wasn’t watching the game, did the Giants already lose a challenge? No? Then the risk would happen on the second challenge where they may challenge something more questionable. Your argument that not using the first challenge on a clear play that you would…
Why the fuck didn’t the Lions challenge it? That should be the story. Officials make mistakes. Isn’t that the whole idea of challenges?
I’m pretty sure the Bills would win the tie breaker if Miami loses out the rest of the way while the Bills win out. That’s the only way I think it’s possible for them to make the playoffs. Any other team getting to 9 wins will win a tiebreaker against the Bills. It’s a cluster fuck of like 4th and 5th tiebreakers so…
If only there was a way for you to walk in to some type of store, a store that sold these magical “download codes”. And when returning home after your journey, you could then input this code into the App Store and BOOM, like magic your iTunes account wallet would show the EXACT same amount of money as what you paid at…
She started the fight. In what world shoukd she be able to sue him and waste the Supreme Court’s time? He apologized. Why should he have to pay her for defending himself?
No. The person in the wrong is the person that started shit. If she walks away and doesn’t start shit, she doesn’t get knocked out. Like in what world can someone start a fight, sue the person protecting themselves, AND THEN waste the Supreme Court’s time with this.
It may have been overheard, but guess what. If she walks away and doesn’t start shit, she doesn’t get knocked out. Like in what world can someone start a fight, sue the person protecting themselves, AND THEN waste the Supreme Court’s time with this.
Bell has almost as many yards from scrimmage in 3? less games. And if the Steelers are such an offensive juggernaut, what are the Cardinals? Because if I do a quick team stat comparison, both teams almost average the exact same points/game, rush yds/game, passing yds/game.
Ummmm how would parity improve? Would Kyrie take a hit? He wouldn’t have to fit under the cap. Evidence? The salary cap is currently $94 million. The Cavaliers are currently spending $129 million. The teams with money would just continue stacking rosters and paying luxury tax like they currently are.
Thank you! I was waiting to get called out on that. I should stop shooting first and asking questions later haha.
That’s not true. Runners can’t line up a defender and then lower their helmet.
There is a penalty for helmet-to-helmet contact on runners. It has to come from the crown of the helmet though. Sherman’s hit appears to be from the side of the helmet.
It’s only a foul if it’s the crown of the helmet.
There absolutely is a rule for helmet-to-helmet contact on runners.