Latency is an issue, however, it should not be a big issue when this technology is needed most: when I am at a cross-walk, intersection, or in a parking lot and I am stopped or moving slow, I can’t see what pedestrians or other vehicles are doing. This solves that problem, and the slow speeds mean latency is not a…

TIL: You should put Blake Bortles in 4th and short situations. 

This game, was in fact, in Tennessee. Unless the Chargers have moved from playing opponents songs at home to painting end zones for the visitors. I know it was a late start, but really, it was a Titan home game.

The first gif is another idea, but your "Springier" pun reminded me of the 2nd.

That, and you are limiting yourself to 3pts on the drive. Getting the ball at the 50 with time on the clock, you are thinking TD odds are favorable, and even better odds for a shorter FG.

Ccorrect. Let’s say it is the middle of a quarter, and a team punts from it’s own endzone, and the receiving team fair-catches it at the 40 (i.e. the punt traveled less than 40 yards).

Bobody's Nurfict.

Sold!

The free throw circle has a 12-foot diameter. Divide the circle into 36 2'x2' areas- yes, many of those areas will not be squares, but it does not matter. Each area is assigned (and labeled on the court) an alphanumeric name (a1, a2, a3...a6 thru f1-f6).

Betts traveled on the throw.

After the game was over, ESPN couldn’t/wouldn't believe that Wazzu had turned it over 6 times.

That is a very good angle. I still think the ball didn’t break the plane. Receiver lunges forward and is down with the ball just shy of the goal line.

For intra-conference matchups, Refs come from the visitors' conference. It is to prevent the perception of home field advantage combined with hometown Refs.

Here I was, thinking you had some sort of tremendous insight or access to an angle we hadn’t seen. Nope, you have two pics that are not conclusive either way. Your conjecture is no better than mine, but at least I’m not claiming mine as fact. Bravo.

You make a valid point. However, reviews, IMO, are for clearly blown calls that were inexplicably missed. This was not one of those calls.

How can you tell that the ball is in the endzone based on the camera angle from the video? I dont think it is. Some agree with me, others agree with you; all of it is conjecture. The Ref who made the call was in a better position to make the call.

In any level of football, the ball has to cross the plane. In the NFL, this would have been a TD because the receiver was not touched on the ground (or on his way to the ground), got up and ran the ball into the endzone. But in NCAA and below, you are down when you hit the ground, even without being touched.

If there is a review, and the result is “call on the field is confirmed,No TD,” Ole Miss benefits from the pause to collect its thoughts, come up with a good play, and come to the line in an orderly fashion. Instead, they had to hurry to the line and snap the ball for a QB sneak, which is not ideal for an offense.

Fully agree. If the clock is stopped for the review, but the “no TD" call upheld, is there an automatic runoff? If not, that is very unfair to Cal, and if Ole Miss had scored in that scenario, you can bet this article would have been written about how Cal was screwed byby the officiating.

He makes a weird lunge for the ball and makes the catch with his waist and legs in the endzone, but the ball possibly not in the endzone. If he stays on his feet, it’s a TD for sure. But the official probably should have called it a TD then gone to the automatic review. But #4 appears to have run an illegal pick play; …