You’re down to the “troll whine” now? And I had such high hopes for you once, son.

My comment that pissed you off: “And I’m sure that there are mutilated girls who are happy with it as well.”

We’re still talking about sepsis in third world countries here. You don’t need your labia to reproduce, and given the variation in labia, it’s a good thing.

You’re still trying to substitute childish insults for answering a simple question. That only makes you look silly, son.

Well I’ve heard many say this. Some had never even seen a picture of one before stating this.

Given fertility rates, I suspect that they’re about the same as generally practiced.

You’ll find that the common thread wherever it is practiced is Islam, whether or not any co-inhabitants due it as well.

You need neither the foreskin nor the labia to reproduce. Need smaller words?

You’re digging your hole deeper, son. I asked you a question and told you the relevance. You degrade into inane insults. You lose.

The most common forms are not removal of the clitoris or sewing the woman shut, but removal of part of the vulva.

Nope. They’re both cutting off flesh seen as unneeded. And they aren’t as far as pure reproduction is concerned.

My name is in response to “Miss Andry”, another poster.

So, you don’t really know. But then, I already knew that.

Yes, the evil menz make them do it.

Nope. It is both.

Oh i read what you wrote. You just come across differently than you think you do.

That is the unusual extreme case. And they don’t sew it shut - you’d die. Lopping of the labia is pretty equivalent. And every once in a while they slip and lop of the whole dick. It’s pretty small at that age.

Unless you were old enough for sex at the time of your circumcision, you have no idea what you’re missing.

Yep, because other countries take it so well when we act all morally superior, right?

Ah yes, the feminist argument of “if you don’t agree with me I won’t fuck you”.

I said “no thanks”. Besides, I’m married.