Less infections primarily because in the first world it is performed under sanitary conditions, with adequate antiseptics. Maybe that’s where the focus should be?

Your “what do you think they’re hacking off” comment made me think you were too young to read the article.

1. You said, and I quote: “actual effects of the two different procedures”.

How old were you?

No, I want to clean house here before acting morally superior elsewhere.

No thank you. Just pointing out a fact.

There aren’t two different procedures. Few instances of FGM perform a clidorectomy or sew the vagina shut. The motivations ARE similar.

good grief get over yourself and your magical labia.

It varies quite a bit, dear.

Comparatively little harm as contrasted against what? Full FGM? That’s rare.

And I’m sure that there are mutilated girls who are happy with it as well.

Yep. I know a woman who lives overseas who only has affairs with Americans or Jewish men for that reason. She’s a rabid feminist.

I’m sure that their are people who think they have a list of benefits for FGM as well.

Why?

Then you have no way to compare which reduces the sensation more, do you?

No whining.

It depends on how far it gets taken. It does reduce it for boys, it doesn’t for girls unless then excise the clitoris.

And the “feminists” I know won’t touch an uncut cock. What’s your point?

Clearly. Boys do die from the complications, they do lose their penises, and it does mutilate and scar them to try and keep them from whacking off. You’re wrong across the board.

Yeah, they are depending on what you’re talking about exactly. There are many different forms of FGM.