You can use the Internet Wayback Machine to access archived versions of websites. Here’s what I found for the guide.

I prefer the coloring in the original. There are more earthy and rusty tones, especially on the character models.

Alright, so I had to do a deeper dive into the Biblical verses being used here. The translation used and the context for these verses helps to understand more of ThatGuy4913's theological bent.

Thank you for the warning. I promptly went and backed up a prior version of the guide so that I would have access to it in case (a) it were deleted and (b) somehow I ever played Persona 2.

Fundamentalists: you need to take the Bible literally.

Or that Russia, China, Syria, and Iran have similar political, diplomatic, or military interests. (Which I guess is the same thing - they’re all combined because they happen to be diplomatic opponents to the US.)

That alignment is madness in plain text.

*Whispers into the microphone*

Agreed. Roto is being edgy, but not really productive here.

This, pretty much. Unlike in crises, the CDC and its response teams have been muzzled by this administration (APNews).

We have the full Mueller report and lots of testimony, which show the fuller workings of obstruction of justice.

No, that’s not it, Roto13. “isn’t shit” doesn’t equal electable anyway - Trump is shit and electable.

No, that’s not it. “isn’t shit” doesn’t equal electable anyway - Trump is shit and electable.

Okay, but the article’s not about Trump.

It’s double-edged.

Edgy.

We could go with giant hologram Biden.

It’s misleading to say criticism is about finding fault when “fault” is only one of several things found by criticism. According to the definition you just quoted without attribution from Lexico, it’s about the analysis and judgment of the merits and faults. The emphasis is on analysis and judgment, and those…

Criticism isn’t about finding fault. It is an evaluative process. As such, it finds facets and characteristics worthy of comment: strengths, weaknesses, and other points of interest.

My dissertation director would have called it turgid. I know this because I’ve written this way. It takes lots of work to try to write big ideas without either being simplistic or, well, turgid.