Infinitely

I cam down here to essentially say the exact same thing. I’m so glad to know I’m far from the only person who thinks this too

I totally get it. But the whole reason we have so many civil cases in situations like these where slut shaming is allowed as a defense is because famous/rich people are above the law to begin with and you can just forget about getting a criminal conviction regardless of how much evidence is there - which is why…

I wanted to clarify accusing the woman of being a gold digger routinely works in successfully getting guys off. Not the keep a brotha down defense

I don’t know whether he’s guilty or not, but on the basis alone that his lawyer came with that tired/weak ass “just the media trying to take a black man down” leads me to believe he’s guilty.

OK NOW the question needs to be asked repeatedly “how much are you getting paid for your testimony??”

I was thinking, based on his comments, he looks more like a guy explaining to Chris Hansen that the wine coolers and condoms in his grocery bag were purely coincidental and he was only there because his daughters friend “needed someone to talk to”