Would you possibly get flustered or furious if, for the dozenth or so time in your life, the police were called on you in a situation you know they wouldn't have been were you a different color? She does sound a little crazy, like she's had it up to fucking here.

As seen on the Huffington Post. Well, as they say, what goes around comes around.

One of the biggest misconceptions about feminism is that women have to blindly support each other. Taylor seems like a lovely person but she's not above critique.

Yeah, don't you know violent white men never harm people outside their own race?

LOL, you must be stupid then.

This story is so tragic. Such suffering, to have to live in Dallas AND get married in Cleveland.

But what frustrates me about this particular piece is that she, in exposing how horrible people can be, became herself complicit in subjecting every black attendee to racism or misogynoir. I passed up multiple invitations to attend the exhibit with friends because I had no intention of being placed in that position…

Who is looking?" And it's always been the same answer for the most part. How do people look? How are people supposed to look? Are white audiences looking at it in the right way? And are black audiences looking to see this piece? And, of course, my question is: What is the right way to look at a piece that is full…

You're a bit backwards, here. GG was created specifically *for* harassing women - at the time, it was specifically Zoe Quinn, although it quickly spread to 'everyone who GG sees as a "SJW" scumbag'. It was only later that others began to claim, "Nuuu, it's about game journalism! It's totally a righteous cause!" even…

The best coverage of it so far came from Deadspin yesterday.

If GamerGate supporters who aren't insane misogynist psychos want to continue on their quest to discuss and question gaming press, game devs, and game publishers' complex relationship... then go start a new title and a new hashtag.

Gamergate, first coined by actor Adam Baldwin, is an amorphous campaign that is ostensibly about ethics in video game journalism and defending the "gamer" identity but has come under fire for its links to a wave of harassment, particularly of women, in gaming.

Thank fuck.

Fuck, yes!

Because they actually went to the authorities and reported the actions, and in the case of Anita, the very organizations hosting her had publicized the actions. Brianna Wu has been in contact with both the police and the FBI, Anita has had her incidents corroborated now by an educational institution, and previously,…

I find it very curious that the sender of the threat had the e-mail redacted, as well. I would think that if someone were to publicize being doxxed, they wouldn't black that out, either, unless there was something to hide. I can send an e-mail to myself and black out all addresses, and make everything look as though…

So, where's the evidence of their full names and full addresses having been posted? Where's the evidence that they've gone to the police and reported it?