Yeah, I was wondering the same thing. His remarks predate all of the things he tried to blame it on.

The reason this doesn’t make sense is that lots of celebrities flaunt their wealth, not just the Kardashians. I highly doubt people would be going on and on about this if it was Anna Wintour or any number of celebrities who own expensive shit.

Oh, for sure, the misogyny is rife on this one. Even after Lochte was shown to have made up what happened to him, he didn’t receive this kind of vitriol.

How are the others things they staged remotely the same as staging a robbery and getting the police involved? She has never “cried wolf” about being robbed; I’m starting to think you morons don’t know what it means. The boy in the story was believed the first few times.

Yeah and isn’t the whole point of “crying wolf” that you’ve actually, ya know, cried wolf before? When else has Kim said she’s been robbed and it turns out she wasn’t?

Lighten up, George. Why are you so uptight?

Yes and you’re an asshole for it.

You sure they were real cameras?

I blame the influx of Gawker people. Can’t they just fuck off to Gizmodo and have a circle jerk amongst themselves?

You’re a jackass. There’s no evidence showing this was made up. If the pink panther robbery ring was behind this, they are professionals and would know the situation regarding cameras. It’s even more likely the hotel had someone in on it. And Kim is a woman who feared she’d be raped. Why are you mocking her for this?…

How is this an example of exceptionalism? Most readers here are not fans nor do they watch the show, but it’s mere speculation and hatred to assume Kim K. and co. made this all up. You’re not smart or special for questioning her, you’re a jerk.

What’s your point? Other celebrities have been robbed multiple times but somehow no one questions their stories.

It’s also super gross how he says, “if all pigs looked like this, I’d take a couple.” Yes because women are objects to be taken. She isn’t even given the benefit of agency.