That's a bit harsh, no?

I'm using the term monoculture in a broader, systemic sense. Monocultures in industrialized agriculture and foresting for instance create are extremely vulnerable, unstable systems in biology.

Gonna send that sucker right back, when it arrives.

My bad, sheepzees of course. But "Sheepzesse" would be a cool name for a not-so-well-selling comic heroine.

Well played. The "chimple" bit is a riot. But wouldn't it be "sheepzess", correctly?

Monocultures rarely prove beneficial for a system or its constituents.

Heartening bit of info. Sometimes I think there is hope for humanity after all.

Well spotted, friend. Yours is not only brilliant, it is also a very interesting term in various fields, Wiki just told me.

Obviously not legally, but the proverbial invisible hand of the free market will always find a way.

I'm pretty sure the panels under 5) don't depict the Joker, but Dick Grayson, posing as the Joker. At least the left one.

But then, people can be charged for anything they are stupid enough to pay.

Highly innovative "BRAAAM" in this one.

I could ask you (again) where the joke was hiding, but let's just move on.

Because anything you wrote is remotely funny, correct?

eyeroll

A hurricane isn't exactly "air", me thinks. Lots of dust, saltwater and other stuff in that air.

Is there anything nukes can't do?

I tried that once, all it did to me was to bore the hell out of me.

All you'd know is that life on rocky goldilocks planets occurred in a ratio of 1:3 in our solar system.

The Drake equation delivers any amount of ET life between zero and gazillions, depending on its inputs, so it surely isn't a "good reason why there might be life on other planets".