No, it will, somehow, magically, dribble down, donchaknow.

Eheh, sharing is caring.

Generations of post-post apocalyptic archeologists are going to lose their sanity over this.

Almost as scary as these critters:

Love it, my thoughts exactly.

Why, pray tell, does it have to be nuclear fission? Regardless of technology, it will always produce highly radioactive waste and it will always be risky business. All technology fails every now and then, why accept potentially disastrous accidents as a default?

Well, there's a difference between a technologically advanced species and a god. If you don't like that, take it up with the dictionary.

That religion is not based on theism, so your point is moot.

Yeah, why tap into safe, waste-free and close to inexhaustible energy sources, when we could just as well cling to 20th century technology that lays waste to hundreds of square-miles only all couples decades?

But none with starships. Also, the Judeo-Christian god is asshole enough for my tastes. I'd wager that few other gods have killed 99.9999999999999% of all life on earth, only because some of his flock were a bit on the promiscuous side of things.

God de-goded then, mission accomplished.

Look, you evidently don't have the capacity to understand what I am talking about, which poses a bit of a problem in a conversation, don't you think?

I'm saying what I wrote, if you can't properly process it, you got your god to thank for your reading comprehension issues.

Right. Amputees are evil. All of them. All the time. And especially those who lost their arms, they are notorious self-touchers.

Creating the universe =/= interfering with the universe. Before the Big Bang there were no mechanistic laws of nature, no space, no time, nothing measurable and nothing to measure with.

You want me to disprove the Big Bang?

Most proposed god concepts also allegedly interfere in mankind's affairs today, which offers opportunity for measurement or, at the very least, statistical analysis. But first one would need to be offered a stable, unambiguous description of the deity's nature and habits - and as you have already stated, such…

a) I didn't describe any particular deity, but set a scope in general terms. Odin, Zeus or Jupiter, too, would be well within that scope, just like probably 99% of all the other gods mankind has invented over the millennia.

First you would need to describe how your god interferes with the world, obviously.

The results should still be measurable. Which is why we have the "God hates amputees" argument.