mehranmoghtadai01
Mehran Moghtadai
mehranmoghtadai01

There are sooo many things wrong with this. First of all, at the moment with the current technology, you cannot have a light-field sensor that small. Second of all, on sensors that small you don't even have depth of field to deal with. Go take a picture with your smartphone and tell me if there is any amount of

Can it do mathematical notations? If not, then LaTeX is still king.

Apps like a video encoder are made for desktops anyway and desktop apps behave the same way as before, so it will run in the background. The suspension thing seems to be only for the Metro apps.

it means it takes light 13.1 billion years to travel here so, noting that light travels at a speed of 671 million mph you can can calculate it. But let me just tell you that it's really really really far.

On the surface this all nice and useful, but it's actually really primitive. It does not display implicit functions, neither does it have the ability of using polar coordinates or even parametric functions. It's a nice feature and a good step, but they need to add a few functionalities to make it actually useful.

There is really nothing wrong with the graph, it's just that the function you put in has way to many asymptotes and way too many points that are undefined, all in all it's just an ugly function.

Hurr hurr

I've been using a Merkur safety razor for half a year now, the amount of money I've saved is unreal.

What large format photographers do is that they have a polaroid back that they use for test shots. So they take a few polaroid shots to see if it's good and then they use the film back. This is because large format film is so much more expensive. Having a digital back however gets rid of all those costs and annoyances.