The “agenda” is add some artifical suspense to an election, whose outcome has been decided for months! Just think about it, the GOP sent in one of their weakest line-ups in ages. Each person more unelectable than the next and in the end they chose the buffoon with the highest entertainment value.

God, dating in DC sucks.

There’s also rumors about Trump’s donation to NAMBLA, and while they’re definitely 100% unfounded and made up by the internet, they do sound like they could be true.

I’m a Clevelander and the distraction of baseball has been such an unbelievable fucking blessing. I can drink to excess on a regular basis because I’m ‘celebrating’ and no one bats an eye, and we can watch baseball instead of the news. Thank god.

Prizes are objective by their very nature. No one is claiming otherwise.

I’m not taking issue since I am speaking for myself. I’m not telling others how to feel about Dylan. Or any other artist for that matter. I get that for some people it’s impossible to enjoy someone’s work if they don’t like that person’s beliefs or approve of their lifestyle. It’s just not the case for me and I don’t…

I don’t hold it against him at all. I think both Sanders and Clinton have our best interests in mind, but they have completely different methodologies. I’ve watched her try, fail, try, then succeed again for a long time, and as a project manager I see this as troubleshooting and getting to the nuts and bolts of a…

Clinton is left of Obama? Bring up policies that show she’s enacted that are to left of Obama, truth is you can’t. If Hillary won in 2008 there would be no Obamacare, even though that is highly flawed.

You must have a hard on for Republicans, how dare you bring up and critcize Hillary’s record of adopting Conservative language & policy, you must be a Conservative.

Your not representative of the left, you’re only interested in power and money. Ok! There is a difference between bringing up the rights crazy theories about the Clinton’s,correct me if I am wrong but they actually think they murdered someone.

We can agree to disagree on that one. Morally, I agree. Realistically? She is a politician who gets scrutinized so heavily for everything, and I just don’t expect that level of bluntness from her.

You make me want to stop supporting Hillary (I won’t, but still)

Talk more about why Hillary is the better candidate, and less about how much you don’t like Bernie’s supporters.

I’ll start. Bernie is not a pragmatist when it comes to economic issues. The republicans will have no trouble blcoking his efforts while also…

Satan vs. Santa? Give me a fucking break. The only person calling Clinton “satan” is you, over and over again sarcastically, in response to any criticism of her, no matter how concrete or valid. Can we not have adult conversations about the candidates?

Honey, she’s bashing herself at this point.

Pretty sure Hillary torpedoed her credibility with progressives all on her own, through things like praising Nancy Reagan on her (non)response to AIDS and trying to demonize her opponent with blatantly false, ridiculously easily disproved attacks.

Yeah he was wrong as fuck too, and pandering his ass off until the country was over 50% in favor of gay marriage. He was leading from behind just like Hillary. Wrong is wrong no matter who does it.

Yeah, it’s mind-boggling to think about, but this sort of “unforced error” is incredibly characteristic of her (and her husband, for that matter). Remember the email thing? Breaking the rules with her own private email server to avoid some ginned up “scandal” about their contents, and thereby creating an actual…

This whole thing is very confusing. It is such a profoundly dumb “mistake” to make and she is so shrewd when it comes to her image. I cannot believe she honestly didn’t know that wasn't true, which means she was lying. But she also must know that she would be called out on it! This is a case of her being stupid or…

Gee, if it weren’t for her history of unflinching support for LGBT rights, I’d find this whole issue pretty worrisome.