Except the government doesn’t have any power here. They’re not the ones who would be firing anybody. So it’s moot. They’re just words coming out of some mouth of a dumbass. They hold no sway over EPSN unless EPSN chooses them to. Which would be on ESPN, not the government.

Except the government doesn’t have any power here. They’re not the ones who would be firing anybody. So it’s moot. Come talk to me when it goes beyond just worthless words.

But she has been warned before about inflammatory language.

The armor was a metaphor. It didn’t have to do with anything about actual armor. It was a metaphor for his game.

Except the government doesn’t have any power here. They’re not the ones who would be firing anybody. So it’s moot. If ESPN cows to them, then it’s on EPSN, not some dumbass in the government. Show me that the government is doing anything more than throwing out words, and I’ll agree with you.

Except the government doesn’t have any power here. They’re not the ones who would be firing anybody. So it’s moot.

Except the government doesn’t have any power here. They’re not the ones who would be firing anybody. So it’s moot.

Except the government doesn’t have any power here. They’re not the ones who would be firing anybody. So it’s moot.

I generally agree. He literally took 2 extra steps. Not like he went hunting for him on the sideline or something. It’s a split second difference between it being legal and illegal. You can’t charge him with some crime over something like that.

I agree with what she said. That doesn’t mean it was appropriate to say in any environment. Otherwise you create a slippery slope where it’s only acceptable if you’re of a certain political affiliation. Or race. Or religion. I despise Schilling. But if you’re gonna fire him, and not Hill, then we have a problem.

What do you define ‘actively and forcefully against’? Like where is the line in the sand that defines that? That seems like an important distinction.

No. I typed that, because it literally seems like that’s what other people are saying.

What are you talking about? She was literally suspended by ESPN in 2008 for inflammatory remarks. This isn’t her first rodeo.

Maybe we should just bring back segregation. Clearly white people don’t want to live with black people, and black people don’t want to live with white people. Does anybody want to live with transexuals? Maybe a neighborhood for those.

It’s time to move to East Providence. Or if you’re really white, Rumford.

Yes, and there are also people who use any excuse to shift blame instead of taking responsibility for their actions.

That’s just alot of blame shifting. That’s saying I can’t be responsible for myself because reasons. The second you start making up bogeymen for your problems, it never ends.

That’s their M.O. Don’t agree 100% with their argument? Rape apologist! Or misogynist! Or racist! It goes on and on. They’re not willing to discuss or debate anything. They’re just looking for back pats from their partners in the ol’ echo chamber.

For what it’s worth, I feel ya. Why take any responsibility for our actions when we can just jump on the ‘blame men’ bandwagon? Everything is mens fault.

And sometimes men are socialized to put womens happiness before their own. Ever heard of happy wife, happy life? That shit goes both ways. I’m not going to say it’s equal, it probably aint. But everybody seems to base their own opinions off their own personal experiences.