medrawt
medrawt
medrawt

Also...I’m not sure why people always try to interpret foreign elections in the context of American elections. You bring up Corbyn, and distill it to a single point “he won more seats because his message” which ignores the mistakes made by his opponent (like announcing plans for a tax increase on old people the week

It’s not about winning, but Willis and others were a bit annoyed with the Chappo guys for their comment that the “left” and “liberals” could work together, but “liberals would have to bend the fucking knee, we are in charge now” because liberals don’t win. Which was an asshole remark in any sense, and also...the

It entered the newsfeed lawfully.

“I don’t see anything wrong with it.”

Mr Holland’s Opus, saw it as a Senior in HS.

It really says a lot that about the character of the Packers’ owners that they have all this money sitting there, yet so many of them still call the farms and outhouses of Wisconsin their homes. A very modest people.

Those people are dumb people (for the moment).

You do realize that he did nothing at all like you’re claiming, right? He tweeted about how stunned he was that Don Jr. put out what he had spent months trying to find. You invented a narrative for him, then used an interview that shows your narrative is wrong to claim that proves he’s full of shit?

The Twitter bio says “work in @nytimes”; he has indeed published articles in the NYT. Not sure how this is misrepresenting himself.

That makes a lot of people not very smart! It’s like you’re asking somebody to undergo a root canal when you suggest they acquire more facts than are immediately available in order to make a judgement. In this case, additional sleuthing would have required a reader to check out the guys bio and maybe run a Google

HA..HA...HAHA....

This article is ridiculous. You saw something out of context, got the wrong impression, and now you’re mad. As someone who’s followed JYS since his quality reporting on Trump rallies during the campaign, at no point did he give the impression he was a NYT journalist about to break this story. He’s been reporting on

Man, this is up there with Burneko’s “I’m so cool because I like to tell you everything is awful” schtick as the worst thing I’ve seen on Deadspin.

Did you contact him? At all? Just wondering…

I’ve been following Sexton for a while now, probably close to a year. He did a lot of reporting from Trump rallies. This piece is pretty unfair to him. He’s never represented himself as anything other than an independent reporter. You’re treating him like a con man because other folks dropped in on his timeline, saw

Maybe I’m in the minority here, but I always understood him as saying he had been working to get the kind of proof DJTJ just tweeted out, not that he actually had a scoop or something he was publishing.

I realize this will require the reader to do more research but simply pulling up the Twitter account and scrolling through the tweets reveals that he gives credit to the NYT and never suggests it was he alone who was scooped. Calling him “a bit of a fraud” is a bit dickish when he gives credit to the people whose work

The number of times science proves “what everyone knows” wrong makes studies like this worthwhile.

I’m with Laura. Baseball, you have teammates to help. Golf is close, but there’s no direct opponent, only the course. Both let you get coaching and counseling during the competition. In tennis, you are alone with your demons. If you happen to be facing a player who has beaten you a few times recently...

Aaand, you’d be wrong on both counts. I mean, fucking boxing has either of those two beat, easy. But tennis is a series of matches over a number of days against all kinds of opponents. Golf is a nice walk, ruined. John Daly made money playing golf. It’s not an easy game to play well, but it doesn’t compare to the