She has been consistent since season 6 on this issue. It would have been FAR MORE ridiculous if she didn’t insist. How do you think that would make any sense, at all, for her character?

On the one hand, I literally got every single thing I ever wanted out of the end. Sansa Queen in the North! All the remaining Starks (including Jon) alive and ascendant! Arya adventuring (although the West of Westeros bit is dumb.) Dany dead and revealed as the megalomaniac she was! So, I should be pretty happy. I…

You aren’t wrong.

Counter-counter-point: Kit’s actually doing the best acting he’s ever done on the show this season.

Meanwhile Littlefinger got to have a different accent minute to minute and it was fine?

No, I think the rest of the pack survives.

He’s older than Christian Bale was when he was cast. 

No you can definitely plead the 5th if another crime is implicated.

Also since when does GRRM care about rightful claims? Where are you getting that?

Tyrion is depicted as a very smart man who is also a good man in show. (A departure from the books where he is currently raping prostitutes as his main hobby.)

The show never portrayed Tywin as a villain. It i

Oh, of course. Agreed. 

And I’d add that the secrecy being complained of here, and I totally get why, is usually a good thing for the accused. It means they don’t have this litigated in the open until a jury decides there is probable cause to charge.

I know people will be mad but I think he’s kind of perfect.

There is a lot fucked up about it. But it definitely doesn’t override rights of self-incrimination. The problem for Ms. Manning is that she was already convicted and sentenced for the crime. She can’t be tried for that crime again. So, she has no valid rights against self-incrimination since no criminal prosecution…

nt. Daenerys had no strategic reason whatsoever to massacre a town full of innocents after they surrendered

Lots of us saw it and everyone argued us down and now it was never there at all? Funny how that works. 

Francis, their youngest son, seemed like a pretty smart, cool, capable  dude. 

Richard was fairly popular in Aquitaine, which was altogether a more civilized chivalric place. But, regardless, he was actually running things in his own duchy from a young age (13 or so) whereas Henry didn’t do much at all.

I think she had a hand in her epitaph though. She’s the only one who would include that she was married to a Henry (a man she by all accounts adored and treated her as almost an equal partner in power) rather than her son Henry’s father, the loathsome Geoffrey of Anjou, whom she loathed.