Who? Who is saying their futures should be ranked?

Yes, you have every right to trash these idiots.

But this article and some of the commentators are clearly asking that they DO get punished.

It’s a First Amendment thing. Yes, they may be fucking racist pieces of shit. But they have a protected constitutional right to be fucking racist pieces of shit.

You’re asking young people who are trying to be funny and edgy to be smart, AND you’re asking them to make sure that things said in private are palatable to everyone in the public. Fuck off man. What they said is wrong, but you can’t thought police people. Until such a time as they discriminate or intimidate or harm a…

Yeah, but why be all rational like that when we can get righteously indignant and bask in our moral superiority to teenagers.

I like how the windsheild wipers were still going in that last shot of it completely submerged.

We’re also the only animal species that doesn’t kill off our weak, which further exacerbates the problem.

“But this is a hybrid car. That means it can drive underwater.”

I realize this may be an unpopular opinion, but I don’t see why I should care. Every person is allowed to be racist, sexist, or prejudiced in whatever way they want to be as long as they’re not infringing on anyone else’s rights. Their life will be affected by their choices. Why do I have to care that they’re garbage…

Buying a Honda Insight is still the worst decision he’s ever made, a problem somehow solved by the second worst decision he’s ever made.

“Luke was on a road trip with his baseball team and needed a charger for his laptop. You’ll never guess what happened next.”

This was not a “crowded” place. It was private text messages. A public university is bound by the 1st Amendment.

“I can’t swim! I can’t swim!”

#GetLukeACharger

A 95 year old active guy with his own hair is pulling major trim at the retirement home. Probably only 1 guy to 10 or so women. Goes to the barber for a break.

From what I gather it goes back to a line in TNC’s “The Case for Reparations” that I found really, REALLY troubling: Coates said he was against socialist reforms (like some of the ones Bernie is advocating) as a form of help/”reparations” for black people...because they’d be going to ALL people regardless of race, not…

“He walked with MLK for God’s sake.” So? Does that automatically make him the candidate for blacks and other minorities?

A lot of people walked in civil rights marches back in the day. It’s no guarantee that they’re still in line with that thinking today. Not saying Sanders is guilty of this, but it’s not an accurate measuring stick.

Hillary gets advance notice and a closed door private meeting, Sanders and O’Malley get ambushed. Right.