Indeed, though I'm a little less excited about the locations... I was really hoping we'd get to take a trip to the Summerset Isles and fuck over some Thalmor on their home turf. Next expansion?

This is a follow up to an article yesterday (linked there at the end,) about which qualities of Max Payne 3 were good and should make the jump to 5. This is a look at which aspects of Max Payne 3 aren't suited for 5 (or just aren't very good.)

I came in around 65 on my most recent play through. If you take your time and do EVERYTHING (which arguably isn't really worth it) you can definitely get that high... I certainly did.

Depends on how fully you play it. ME1 could be beaten around 10 hours, or 60. If you do every single side quest (which requires visiting every single planet in the galaxy) you'll clock in around 60-80.

Dude, where the hell are you going with this? Why are you attacking me like I've posted any more than one or two comment about wanting this go down? Since that one comment and reply I've been doing nothing but responding to "defenders of justice" all day. In which, I often stated "hey guys, we disagree, its over…

As a vet you should know you have no moral grounds in judging someone like that. You also know that losing someone, whether a friend or a family member, can cause different reactions in different people. This may be a gaming website, but don't forget you're talking to real people on here.

Word. No reason they can't both be "good" maps, especially considering the care put into the Skyrim one. I mean, when it gets up to Riften, they managed to replicate its exact layout. That was nuts. Calling that crappy is just unnecessarily spitting on someone's hard work

And whats you're point? To make me feel bad? You win, man, good job. I posted because I felt hurt and uncomfortable about something, and you did the public service of berating me for it.

Then congrats on meeting your quota for giving people shit over something they care about.

It wouldn't make a difference, and its really beating a dead horse now. Both the author and Stephen apologized— do they agree? Who cares, they can see why someone would find it insensitive and said sorry. Let's move on.

So I can't? I don't get it. There's no winning here, clearly.

I wasn't asking for censorship, I was simply asking to push it to tomorrow. If you think that's censorship, fine whatever. Its not happening anyway, but the author and editor both apologized... it clearly wasn't their intentions.

I'll actually have a peaceful and mournful day remembering a family member that died overseas, and worrying about those in my family that still are.

If I was from the country in question and saw this, yeah, I'd probably ask the same thing.

I do too, and being someone from a military family you should know that you have no right to judge others so harshly. We all have different experiences, just give everyone respect even if you don't disagree.

Sorry you feel that way. I'm happy I could make you feel like such a smart-pants.

Asking to simply show it tomorrow isn't censorship, its being tasteful.

Its not getting taken down, that's clear. Both the poster and the editor have apologized for it. You may not be from the US, in the US, or give a damn about the US, but that doesn't mean there aren't people out there who do.

Its strange that you write so much to convince me not to be offended by it. I saw something, I felt it was hurtful and wrong, so I talked about it.

You really depress me.