Well, since my anecdotal experiences are at least as accurate of an indicator of what "feminists" do as yours, I've actually never, not once, in my whole entire life met a feminist who shamed stay-at-home mothers. Are you sure the women at those cocktail parties were feminists and not just, you know, mean?

Werewolf epidemic. Very bad news. Wear emergency silver.

1. I fail to see how your status as a law student or the length of your relationship has any bearing on whether you are, or are not, an abusive jerk in your relationship. If anything, being a law student is a point against you.

Every time I see her visage on a poster or magazine cover, I have the same thought: "Stop trying to make Lana Del Rey happen! She's not going to happen!"

Not that I am, like, the Kurt whisperer or anything, but I get the impression he wanted a certain kind of low-key regional fame that a lot of Northwest bands were getting at that time. But even when the prospect of international fame loomed, he imagined it being more like regional fame on a larger scale — you know, it…

I could be over-extrapolating here, but based solely on what you wrote in this post, you sound like a sexist, controlling asshole, so that could be why feminists don't like you.

They don't see it as killing a baby. They SAY they see it as killing a baby as a rhetorical technique to shut down arguments and try to claim the moral high ground.

Yeah, it's obvious that you're deeply disturbed by the prospect of women controlling the contents of their own wombs. Militant vegans use the word "slaughter" to try to shame meat-eaters, too. Doesn't work there, either.

The way to get rid of abortions is 100 percent reliable contraception. Actually. Which you lot oppose just as much as you oppose abortion.

It's a very troubling precedent. Corporations have full personhood. Zygotes have full personhood. The only group without full personhood is women.

Me too! I loved CSA season last year — it displaced the "acquire produce" decision making in just the right way, and for about eight weeks my diet was, like, all produce all the time.

I never said any such thing. I'm not a bit tolerant of anti-choicers. I mean, I do tolerate them, because sometimes I'm related to them and stuff, but I'm not tolerant of their *views.*

Compassion? Respect for life? You have got to be kidding me. I didn't see any of that in the conservative evangelical world. A bunch of narcissim, self-righteousness, and hypocrisy. Not to mention false witness, and bucketloads of stone-throwing.

If they grab your arm, it's assault and you should prosecute.

Apparently, as long as you are on a public sidewalk, yes. And, in fact, we should.

I'm stuck on "optically molest." Does that mean ogling? Trash-talking someone's appearance? Or is it some new urban dictionary thing I'm too old to know about? I'm so confused!

Nope, not hot. Romney was sorta almost hot, and Paul Ryan was hot until he posted those cheesy weightlifting pictures (and until he opens his mouth, let's be honest) but Boehnor is not hot.

Sorry, "Democrat" base is a dead giveaway that you're a Republican sympathizer, and describing a bunch of things that you really *want* to be true. But you don't have any more insight into the psychology at play, or the likely electoral outcome, than the people predicting a Romney victory in 2012

It's misogynistic because we live in a patriarchal culture that associates femaleness with badness, weakness, and vulnerability. Calling somebody a crude name for that particular body part symbolically reduces them to that body part, and is a form of social domination — less than a rape threat, but heading in that…

How strange. It's almost like being perpetually hungry and low on blood sugar turns people into assholes.