Different color. Different shine. Odd hairline. Rest of hair parted in middle and strangely pushed back from bang line. All signs point to Bad Clip-In(TM). Right? I mean, right??? Or have we crossed the line where the rest of the world seems to be such a dumpster fire that the hair universe is just bad now?

Your grandma rules.

You mean the “I want to speak to your manager?”

I was in 7th or 8th grade when my grandmother took me to the mall Regis and told them I wanted to look like Rachel from friends. I have super thick, course, kind-of-wavy-but-more-frizzy hair. They gave me what the stylist called a “star cut” which is actually (according to her) how they do “the Rachel.” They part the…

Yeah, none of the celebs pictured in the article actually have the Rachel. And the picture the article links to as their example of the Rachel is from season 3 of Friends, which is long after Aniston got rid of the Rachel haircut (which was only in season 1 because she hated it). That’s’s just shoulder length hair…

Agreed, of all of the looks she had during the run of the show that was the least flattering. I even like the cut from the pilot episode better.

Yeah, none of those cuts featured in the article are actually The Rachel. And you’re right, the actual Rachel haircut was a layered nightmare that is too high maintenance for anyone who doesn’t keep a full-time hairstylist on retainer.

WTF is wrong with boot-cut jeans?

Rachel had a few different looks over the life of Friends, with the length differing dramatically but I assume we’re talking pure “Rachel” here?

Those are the worst clip-on bangs I’ve ever seen! They can’t be real...really???

Pot makes pizza better and helps with periods, seizures and breakups. Pot does not make men better husbands.

This is what it seems like to me too. I was taken aback by the child support issue. Custody is better referred to as decision-making ability. If both parents share decision-making ability and time spent with the kids and are on equal financial footing, child support should be a non-issue. Unless Brad has substantially…

If I had that kind of money, and didn’t want my kid’s father in my life, he would not be in my life. Sure, we can say he “should” contribute all we want, but she doesn’t NEED him to, which means she could bail if she wants and never have to see him again. 

Many years ago a wise woman warned us Brad was an addict.

I don’t know. It seems that Angie may be the one missing the chip here. She acts like the kids are hers only and she’s fighting in the court of public opinion to make him look like a bad dad. It’s not as if she can’t support the children herself, and $9 million is a lot of money. She doesn’t need more money from him.…

I always wonder how side pieces who get promoted to wife act so surprised when their ill-gotten gains end up treating them as badly as they they did their previous partner. Like, do these women really believe that the wife didn't understand him and that she was actually crazy? 

My ex was a stoner, and 90% of the time, he was sooooo boring. Since he was high, he had a whole world going on in his head, but also because he was high, he didn’t bother sharing, so it was hours of silence. The other 5% of the time, he was hilarious, and the last 5% he was mean.

Possibly in the same interview, she also said something about how boring people who smoke weed all the time are. I don’t think it was super widely known what a stoner Pitt was at the time, and she didn’t say it in relation to him at all, but I had heard some radio interview with a celebrity pot dealer who named Pitt…

All of my references are 5+ years old, but I honestly think about this quote all the time.

Many years ago, a wise woman warned us that Brad Pitt was missing a sensitivity chip....