I can grasp this as a concept and I don’t think you’re wrong for wanting that or anything of the sort. I’m just talking from an institutional standpoint it doesn’t make a lot of sense. Someone else brought up a point though about appeals and if they overturn his first conviction what happens. But I think if there were…

I did not think of that, good point. Could we set up some sort of system where, should he appeal the first one and win, then the second trial becomes slated start and he remains in prison during his trial as would normally occur (assuming someone doesn’t pay bail/ the judge doesn’t allow bail)? I feel like it saves…

But there’s no point to prosecuting them. There is no more punishment he can receive; he starts in jail, regardless of the outcome of the next trail he remains in jail. What is the purpose of continuing to pile up charges?

I honestly can’t say one way or the other for certain, but I can’t imagine I would care. He already got the max sentence and short of the death penalty there’s nothing else to be done.

This is something I never quite understood. He’s convicted of murder and is sentenced to life without parole, what’s the point of having more trials? Isn’t this just a waste of money and time?

I agree that they were doing whatever they can to get him on tilt and it clearly worked, but the practice squad guy walking over during warm-ups is bush league and regardless of how often it happens calling someone a faggot is crossing a line and should, in my mind, excuse some of Odell’s actions (though not all).

I heard what Doc called Kennedy, it wasn’t too hard to predict Doc getting the shaft in future Kennedy games. Grudges are real

This article is very ahead of its time in making something about race that wasn’t actually about race.