Except SubbyMcSubface is a sub, not a boat, so this is all ridiculous.

Like this wasn’t expected?
I’m still wanting to see Mountain Dew to use ‘Hitler Did Nothing Wrong’

I ask for suggestions from the public until i don’t like them, then i do as i please.

i feel kind of bad for you here, since your attitude about this has been exemplary, but there is one point you just made that needs to be addressed. “...but this is not a research paper or a science document. It’s a fun blog and it’s not the only one (blog) that described this event as cannibalism today.” this is…

It’s no more cannibalism than if a human ate a monkey; just because they’re both “sharks” they’re not the same species.

It does makes sense that it should be “species” as, correct me if I’m wrong, I believe “cannibalism” was first used to describe humans eating another human, which are the same species. When they extended the use to zoology, that’s the definition that stuck, and it has been accepted as such. Sure we shouldn’t tell the…

Again this isn't cannibalism as they are different species.

It isn’t cannibalism. They’re not simply “two sharks”. Not only are they from a different species, they’re from a different family. We’re more related to orangutans than those two sharks are. While his attitude isn’t top-notch, you shouldn’t be so anti-intellectualism, either. I mean, are great white sharks and whale…

It’s not cannabalism. They are not the same species.

Despite his attitude, he’s not wrong. Cannibalism involves two individuals of the same species. A tiger shark and a banded houndshark (one word, another mistake by Chan) are of different species. They’re actually from different families for that matter. We generally don’t eat tarsiers but if we do it won’t be…

Different species of shark, or different family for that matter, which means humans and orangutans are more related than them. Tiger shark is Galeocerdo cuvier and a banded houndshark (it’s one word by the way, another mistake by Chan), is Triakis scyllium.

Sorry, but they are two different species of shark. Not cannibalism. Continue to defend this ignorance and you’ll be put into the stupid bucket too.

Which is why, forgive me, you were called stupid. Because there are many species of shark, not just one.

It’s only cannibalism if it’s the same species. “Shark” is not a species, it’s a family of species, like “primates” would be for us. If you eat a chimpanzee it’s not cannibalism. If one species of shark eats another, it’s not cannibalism. We were all taught this in middle school biology.

It has to be the same species. A bird eating another bird is not cannibalism. A wolf eating a coyote isn't cannibalism. A large species of shark eating a smaller species of shark is not cannibalism.

A Great White, a Hammerhead, and a Goblin are all species of sharks but they look like they’re from different planets. Some of them are so distant from each other they are in separate portions of their respective Order. In human terms that’s the distance between us and tarsiers or lemurs, which I could definitely eat…

Why don't you tell Eli you need to protect her because she can't protect herself.

You’re a boob.

They’re different species. In some countries, eating monkey brains is considered an aphrodisiac. Is that cannabalism?

How is it cannabilsm you stupid millennial fuck.