mazda3hb
TeeCee
mazda3hb

If this were a Democrat, they’d have been pressured to resign already.


I learned to drive in the Regal version of this car, also had the Pontiac version of it too, later on. What forgettable cars...

The ride I took in GNX Prototype #6 with my Big Brother who worked for Buick in that era - I’ll never forget that day.

Yup, we’ll get them hopelessly addicted to opiates and stuff them down their throats like candy - but don’t you be smoking that devils lettuce - that’s a life-time banning!

Yes!!!

Lets actually pay the team that shows up, makes the tourney, and wins it all the money instead of the perennial underachieving mens national team.




Toyota or Impreza:

The Impreza will have the better driving dynamics, including the ‘impossible to not be at least more fun to drive than the Toyota’ factor.
With the Subaru, you won’t ever worry about snow or adverse conditions.
They have the most rock solid driving dynamics across a lineup I’ve ever driven.

The Yota,

Yup - it’s because after a dealer takes delivery, it’s essentially THEIR car, it doesn’t belong to the Manufacturer any more. Basically, Dealers are like an outlet mall for cars. They deal in volume direct from the distributor. What they buy the car for and what they sell it for are two widely varying numbers.

And

It’s funny you say that.
I grew up in a 1970's era Metallic Brown Buick Electra Wagon.
It is because of that car that my heart will always have a special place for long roofs.

I get that, but the suggested penalty doesn’t differentiate who owns the vehicle and or the need they may or may not have for it. Jacking up costs could certainly make a soccer mom who should be in a compact SUV from getting into a Suburban for spurious reasons - but construction trades, trucking, people like me, It’d

Yup, I imagine this is exactly what YOU look like right now.
Except you in your moms basement.

Did you link the google search because there isn’t a single link to any reputable online publication that covered this? Or are you just that intellectually lazy?

Ps: it’s rhetorical question everyone knows you’re a loon.

But Ford doesn’t have the money to research or design more fuel efficient engines for their fleet and need Trumpy and his stooge at the EPA to roll back emissions standards.


Eating what I’m fed - says the guy that promotes conspiracy theories over facts.

OH MY GOD how do you even get out of bed every day? Sad sad little person.

Citation? 

Some rando trumper thinks he knows more than a guy who actually works at the EPA.

Cute.

So you admit that you’re fine with corruption and lies so long as they agree with your political positions?

It’s not about ending corruption at all, it’s just dumbshit petty revenge for idiots.

Gratz.

Except he’s not right.. This is BS feeding off dumbshit conspiracy theories that global warming is a hoax. No automaker has publicly said they want, or agree with lowering the standards back down. If they really wanted it that way, they’d have sided instantly with Trump the seconds the words left his lying face.

I

When they offer something that can tow 9000+lbs, and actually carry 6 to 7 real sized adults and all their stuff - then yeah, I’ll be first in line for something more fuel efficient than my Silverado.

make it vehicle-dependant”

Why do you want to penalize people that legitimately need these large vehicles? Doing as you suggest would put a huge burden on Trucking fleets and small businesses that use large vehicles for their work. The fact is, unless manufactures offer some sort of alternative (they really don’t)

Nice Faux news talking points.


Yeah, because I believe anything the Trump appointed head of the EPA has to say about anything. Especially in this case as; If this were killing profits for automakers, they’d have dropped these standards the second Trump said he was going to axe them.

Instead, what have they done? They’ve held onto them, and said at