As you stated the new car is a “nicer” car. My question is though, WHY? Why does every car have to get nicer? Why cant companies just continue to offer a car for what it is? Why do they keep trying to have a car grow with the audience it is currently hot with? All that does is necessitate a NEW base model to come in…

Where is the negativity in this post? It’s a series of facts.

I, personally, ADORE the C7. It’s a good car. 

I actually did that for a friend of mine who had lost his job and whose wife had just had a baby 2 months premature. Although it was only two tires. He picked me up one day to go to the hospital to see the kid, and I was like, why are your front tires bald? So, I took him right to the closest tire store which, funny…

Still not reliable as a Chevy.*

In the history of Jalopnik, have you posted a positive story about the Corvette?
For example, the ZR-1 beat the Ford GT lap time at VIR (a week afterwards, I might add), but not a peep on Jalopink.... Yet Jalopnik did run a headline along the lines of “Watch the Ford GT absolutely destroy the VIR” (or something like…

Update Feb. 20, 2019 3:55 P.M. ET: The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety has responded to Jalopnik’s request for input on this bill, writing in an email:

Can’t finance tires over 96 months.

Or Jag’s F-Type Concept from 2000...

I’ve seen enough Roadkill episodes where the car backfires out the carb to know that putting your hand over it while spraying starting fluid is probably not a good idea.

More like Tata.

everything old is new again.

Oh cool it’s a Shelby Series 1.

slips the serpentine belt over top of the pulleys

Hammond takes this up a notch with in-car exercise equipment.

Because then they wouldn’t open ‘like this’ - which is much more important than any weight savings.

Spoken like a non-billionaire.

They don’t call it a “cockpit” for no reason.

And still running fine despite virtually no care and maintenance performed since it left the showroom. Yeah, what a terrible car.