I am bit confused

“My regular passengers drive lifted Shelby and Roush-tuned Ford pickups”

Since your definition of better vehicle is that of a “80 year old” company not even able to match/outdo the product of a “shitter” company, its better that you go back to your coccoon and continue your disturbed hibernation.

Now david can have a newly rusted latest gen grand cherokee

Exactly my point. Porsche took almost 80 years to get to where it is and you expect tesla to reach the same quality point within a very short period? Even with 80+years of automotive history yet this taycan cant even acquire greater bragging rights than a “flaky-junk”tesla? Thats really a big shame.

Would you buy a Cadillac merely because “it’s a Cadillac”? Or is that not a reason enough?

Neutral: What Will Come Of GM’s White House Meeting?

And yet they couldnt release any data/specs that says “look our taycan is way better than panel gap filled tesla.

Were you unaware of the excellent track performance history of porsche products and yet they couldnt come up with a better product? 0-100 in 2.6 secs vs 0-100 in 2.4 secs. Which one sounds better? 93 kwh battery vs 100 kwh battery. Again which one looks better? 

15 mins of track time only for that kind of money?

But the availability of this cruiser for purchase and import to USA is the million dollar question

Nope, I disagree with you. @Santa clause and @tekdemon have already provided the counterarguments. Taycan shouldnt just feel like a luxury car, it should be a uberluxury car for that kind of money.

I agree with david totally. Even forget about the value aspect, what does the porsche offer for bragging? Nothing. Battery size-no. Range-no. Even 0-100 a BIG NO. Only styling is the plus. 

Not upto what was expected. In terms of all the comparisons on paper, tesla model s turns out to be a much better car than taycan except styling. So for the porsche badge and styling alone, I am suppose to pay an extra 50000 grand?

Did anyone call me?