I’d wager a single asshole pedestrian with an airhorn would be though.
I’d wager a single asshole pedestrian with an airhorn would be though.
If by “working” you mean intentionally making the problem worse so that people give up... then, yeah.
I would say Miatas and S2000s get cross shopped with coupes simply because they’re legitimately good cars that weren’t offered as coupes.
As someone who is old enough to remember when the Miata came out, I can tell you they could’ve charged whatever they wanted.
It has to be simply from the fact that it’s “only” 1,000 hp. HP = Torque*RPM/5252
It was kind of insane how much market share Harley had back in the day. Even during the great recession, they were still turning a profit.
Your’re assuming Brian isn’t dead in F9 and the plot doesn’t revolve around avenging his death.
I suspect the driverocalypse will start by making it illegal to drive your own car inside of city limits, then interstates... then, eventually, back roads.
We’re absolutely all going to end up riding around in pods... The question is if there will still be real cars being made for driving “hobbyists”, and if it will always be legal to drive your own car or ride your own motorcycle on public roads.
Simpler solution... Take a page out of the Woodward cruise’s book and put gravel down on the road at the end of the day.
Fair point. It also fails to address the accessibility of emotional support animals, people dealing with dwarfism, people dealing with giantism, as well as people who like wearing really tall hats.
I think that’s a little unfair to the people developing the systems (aside from unnamed companies that release relatively unproven systems into the wild)
It doesn’t look like it’d be tough at all to make a version that’s wheelchair accessible. It seems a little premature to condemn an entire program based on a single press rendering.
An empty car that’s on the road is a drain. It’s consuming energy while not transporting anything.
Remember, once this technology is mature....