Its about the amount of space the block actually takes up under the hood.

Back in the '50sChevy called its new engine family the "small block" because it was smaller than the "big block". However, starting with a 265 cu in (4.3 liter) in 1954, these engines are in fact enormous by any standard.

Plenty of people on here agree with me. I wouldn't call the opposition the majority.

The cops should have done that and it would have been great if they did.

Actually it was the whole right side now that I've watched it for the fifth fucking time. he was moving when he hit the kid and his wheels came off the ground.

When are people running from the cops logical? Your whole argument is weak.

You're not making any sense. The truck moved toward the car and hit it. It was moving at decent pace and barely hit his brakes before hitting the car.

Lol that sounds like it blows dick. And great job getting high, I hope it doesn't make your parents house smell too bad.

He did but he didn't hit anyone and he wasn't trying to. The kid may have hit someone if he was left unchecked and people continued to stay in the park. The probability of the kid hitting someone is much lower than the probability of the truck hitting the car at a different angle and putting the bumper into the cabin.

Are you high? The truck was moving. Even in some hypothetical world where it isn't it doesn't matter. Its not like the kid could have stopped in time to not run into the truck. His goal was to cause a crash. Frankly that's a more aggressive goal than what the kid's was, its not like kid was trying to hit people.

I have a real job from 9-5 est with lunch at 11:00. I don't know what the fuck schedule you're on but it doesn't sound like you actually do anything or you're wasting your break arguing with me. I guess if you really like talking to me that much that's great but I wouldn't spend my break that way...

That point comes when other reasonable means have been exhausted. At which point if that kind of action is necessary have the cops do it.

And that isn't directly equatable. If the only way to stop the kid was to run into him you'd have a point but there were a lot of other less extreme options.

A good portion of the car ended up under the truck and the truck's front right came off the ground. That isn't simply running into something. That is a major impact.

If you're going to go that route all the what ifs about what the kid could have done go out the window too.

Yes you are. You're trying to use "what if" scenarios to justify actions. I'm simply stating what should have been done regardless, that's not hypothetical, that's pointing out error.

Is that a typo or did you really call me deuce? What the fuck is that?

Potentially prevented by probably causing. You aren't making much sense.

Lol are you serious? Did you just relate putting out a fire to driving into a car?

It is much safer because its done by someone who at least has some idea what they're doing an where to do it. In addition to that its not some street justice that could have resulted in people dying.