You know how social issues articles get cross posted like Ferguson stuff on Deadspin?

I just found 165 new friends. I thought I was the only person this happened to.

You say it’s everywhere then only apply it to one side of the climate debate. Well Done, I believe you and your politics.

Waiting for Peter King behind the scenes article of Cowboys explaining how classy organization is.

A lot of people over the years have made reference to the game in terms of how it imitates real life.

That’’s great but as I responded to the other person it’s not the reality of what happened in specific instances I’m talking about.

It’s not. But I live in New York, and to most people here if I were to tell them I’d give their kid a chance to shoot a gun they would flip. Which was exactly my point.

Just genuinely wondering how people who live inside liberal bubbles feel about giving their children a chance to experience unbiased thought. Or better yet a chance to shoot a gun.

I’m sorry. That idea is wrong and elitist.

No, you are completely turning this debate on its head now. You asked me (a normal citizen) to provide evidence that contradicts something that science has very little data on - cause.

To be fair I can't tell if you're debating or not. You've raised no concerns with anything I have said.

If it’s not in dispute why care?

When you acknowledge the quality of evidence and not consensus is important let me know and I'll address the rest of what you said.

And your assertions have base? Please.

My statement on scientists is not stupid. People who go into industry do so in order to make money to support themselves. People who go into climate science do so largely based on a notion that they are going to help the environment. If there was strictly a scientific motivation they would likely go into another…

Or you could go back to attempting to justify rape on tv.....

No. What I am saying about preconceived notions is no one who has any reservation about the man made climate change narrative goes into that field because it’s at the bottom of the heap in terms of real groundbreaking science. As a result the field is an echo chamber. Here’s another way to put it in perspective. I’m…

Thanks for the intellectual discussion. I’m glad my thoughts resonated in a way where you could show me how wrong I am and help educate me about helping the future.

Lack of atmospheric warming for the last decade and modified temperature data attempting to show otherwise would be lack of evidence. The fact that data can be modified at all without outrage shows the lack of integrity in this field.

Is it worth my time to undermine a highly funded large group of people who enter their field of study with preconceived notions about how the climate works?