mathblasterz
MathBlasterZ
mathblasterz

I don't like Trump but the report about the lawsuit is grossly inaccurate. The USFL won the lawsuit but damages were awarded in an extremely low amount.

I think most people were just kind of interested to try a hackers toy that deep down they realized was just a gimmick. How many of that segment are going to buy it now? 0? I'm sure you'll need a fb account to buy it / use the drivers from here on out. Instead of using metadeta they can use their motion sensors to

I actually think this is great. The Union strike / Private institution lockout balance will reveal these players are overcompensated. Bye bye scholarships, hello taxes. Most public colleges insist you pay for health coverage to attend anyway. So the crap about injuries is garbage. The disenfranchised here will end up

Krugman? You're trolling right? Honestly the fact that you would allude to ANYONE as some sort of uncompromised source of information tells me everything I need to know about you. I hope you realize Milton Friedman won the Nobel Prize in Economics as well.

This is the catch 22 as a Republican right now. True conservative solution would not allow this to take place but instead we have a corrupt idiot carrying the torch here. Corruption in general is the problem in Washington on both sides. Playing the politics game with tax credits is corruption. The true conservative

I guess this is in opposition to the Democrat tax plan that screws everyone.

I think most people reading kotaku are of a higher intelligence than the majority of the population. This video is much more useful to people of a lower intelligence who do not understand the scientific method.

That's actually completely fair.

Definitely hate the guy but anarchy seems to be the point. Quite honestly what is more interesting is how it follows what seem to be social norms in new societies: Initial movement toward cooperation immediately followed by a limited form of rebellion.

Isn't it the point to see if random humans not in contact can work together despite anarchy to achieve a common goal? Complaining or adding rules seems to taint the very intent of the idea. If you draw the line here why not just ban people who aren't in communication with others as they are ruining the game as well.

This whole situation is great.

Most of what you say is irrelevant. The implication initially was that they would be released during this expansion cycle. In terms of changing the timeframe within the past year is NOT a long time. They are using them to sell the game so that by definition makes them a selling point. Considering I was pretty clear I

I know as a development team art assets can be divided among team members and prioritized as needed. I also know these assets were promised to be part of the Pandaria release. The bullshit where you pretend like we weren't promised something needs to stop. The attitude to then focus on these assets as a big feature of

I'm trying hard not to be a bitch here but it is SO damn difficult. I don't even play blood elf. I mean I certainly get that the wholesale change has to seamlessly integrate with existing armor which I imagine takes quite a bit of work. All that said WHAT THE FUCK, this was promised as part of the LAST expansion and

As a Sabres fan I concede the above picture is the fault of Team USA picking Ryan Miller as its goaltender. If he gets to start again is GG USA.

I don't always like Blizzard but that was mostly players supporting that, not Blizzard.

Not going for the knee jerk reaction defense but try and think about what you're saying man. You complain about SC because of build orders while you use a chess comparison?

Look at what you are doing. Your first post was filled with reason and reality although a bit incorrect. This last one is just unrealistic and designed to make a point. Unlimited bandwidth? At what 56K? Service providers can't legally prevent the creation of a separate network. I was not suggesting that we were close

I take some issue with attacking the ideology even if there is SOME accuracy in what you say. My disagreement lies with your inability to account for the market response to a crippled product. The comparisons to the current state of television fail to take into account that the current tv systems ended up the way they