Oh and afterburners and solid fuel boosters are also allowed

Let them choose any engine they want as long as the car comes in under a certain weight and dimension. You think anyone would build a turbine?

I went from hating that movie to it being tied for my favorite in the franchise. Putting modern engines in classics is cool and I will dedicate my life to it as soon as I hit the next powerball

ahem

Having a standard isn’t unreasonable, industry sets standards all the time. Just look at the Germans

I think regenerative braking is a must. First of all that’s the whole benefit of hybrids is you don’t lose all the energy you put in, but also all the precautions truckers have to take to not cook their brakes.

Lexus Plexus Nexus Sexus Texus

You don’t have to rhyme with Honda, you can use a model number, you also don’t have to have your line end in Honda, it can be somewhere in the middle

Carfax is in for a pay day because people should definitely be checking every used car purchase in the area

I think we often forget that moderation is a thing

I wouldn’t kick that ass out of bed

If it did it would be the Miata coup we always wanted

Only if they drop a turbo H-6 in it. The redeeming quality of a Baja over a real truck is if you can hoon the shit out of it

That doesn’t sound right, especially on the WRX that doesn’t have a trick center diff

You haven’t seen the WRX market in Colorado. All common sense tells you this is CP, Denver craigslist says worth a test drive.

Imagine a gold ekranoplan making weekly trips from D.C. to Florida and back

Who says the hillbilly version is not cool? The only question is build quality.

That first bit of Brazilian laws seam reasonable. Coasting can lead to you cooking your brakes or if you have a shitcan your brakes might be bad, I’m legitimately less comfortable driving in flip flops but I suppose people in a hot climate who live in open footwear might be more used to them. No one runs out of gas on…

Cd at least when applied to an airfoil is multiplied by its footprint area, not its frontal area but you still make a valid point. The other thing is Reynolds number, cd is applicable to an object of a particular size moving a certain speed, and as those factors change Reynolds number scales and has a different…

Are these all for the same Reynold’s number? What about when you factor in area?