Normally I don't bother, but I logged in to upvote this.

I can't believe this is what I'm asking, but anyone have any info on that Spielberg book he's holding?

So sue me, I got a bit too excited.

Exactly. This is literally the opposite of a plot hole. The scenario is actually covered many times over as a plot device.

May seem weird, but as someone in Los Angeles: a job is a job.

Few filmmakers are as financially well-off as Del Toro to afford all of them. Every filmmaker would have the collection size of Scorsese - reportedly the biggest in the world - if able.

Fuck all of this.

The difficult part is playing enough with the form that it remains interesting. Bo Burnham is doing this, but while others would certainly like to take the same risks and divert from the expected, they just don't have the means in terms of production, at least just starting. Maybe people will find a way.

Sorry, but this one was absolute garbage.

When i saw Zoolander I was a kid, and that was one of the references/cameos that I never understood. Never even laughed until I got older and realized who he is.

I liked The Lone Ranger too. Perhaps I should kill myself.

Hey, I liked Dark Shadows.

I have zero recollection what happened in the first Cloverfield, let alone anticipation for another.

I always hate the absurd excuse of 'more people go to the theater, we're getting eyes on films'. BULL. SHIT.

I'm a wholehearted proponent of more female centric shows and films in entertainment, but why when given the chance do the female creators themselves opt for such benign and regenerated premises which at most demean the central characters scope and character arc? This certainly isn't always the case, and Girls does…