So they used a flaw metric, as evidenced by Texas A&M losing to unranked Mississippi State? Go figure, maybe you’re the one who needs to get a clue.

I’ve outlined the fundamental flaws of SOS and yet you continue to ignore them to repeat your own inane point.

With the 4K, 30 frames option having noticeably downgraded textures and draw distance.

Considering I’ve advocated for Ohio State being in the place of Texas A&M, your grasp of reality is sadly in the realm of Trump and Co.

And A&M has played powerhouses like UCLA (3-5), Prairie State (5-3, but not even in Power-5) and New Mexico State (2-6), so it’s not like their OOC is somehow better.

Which you conveniently ignore isn’t showing the whole picture. The reason Texas A&M has a tougher ‘SOS’ is because their conference is filled with paper tigers, teams with inflated wins because their OOC schedule is designed to play a bunch of crappy teams.

According to Merriam Webster, vaunted is “often spoken of or described as very good or great”.

Look at how the SEC fares compared to OOC and in Bowl Games to other Power 5 schools and tell me they’re the ‘vaunted’ conference.

How have they done their time? We keep getting new information into just how shitty Joe Paterno is and yet we still have plethora of Penn St. fans insisting on blaming the victims instead of the coach?!

Additionally, tell me that if things were reversed with, say, Stanford as ranked #1 nationally and Washington’s only loss was to Stanford by 3 scores, would UW even be considered for the top 5? No. Yet somehow the SEC, despite showing that they are top-heavy with a bunch of paper tigers, gets the benefit of the doubt…

Don’t forget Texas A&M needing to beat the next-to-last Pac-12 team in overtime....at home.

When you schedule OOC games to be as cupcake as the SEC has, it’s no wonder everyone in the SEC has a winning record, which allows Texas A&Ms schedule to be ‘stronger’ by playing a bunch of paper tigers. I’m not saying I want A&M to be playing Ohio State or Michigan, but you look at OOC SOS rankings, and the Pac-12…

SEC bias is real

I think names are important for a game because they are one of the first clues that you get in regards to the game, as well as expectations towards the game.

I’m looking for a Seymour Butts. HEY EVERYBODY, I WANT A SEYMOUR BUTTS!

It’s no use! Take THIS!

Well now that’s unfair. How is Lara supposed to beat a hedgehog who can slow down time?! And who has the misfortune of being associated with Sonic 2006 ;)

I’m still irked by the changes they did to multiplayer. Lack of Titan shields absolutely blows and makes Titans more of a battle of attrition.

What kind of question is Shadow of the Tomb Raider trying to answer? Rise of the Tomb Raider was supposed to be Lara’s “rise” from adventurer to the Tomb Raider we all remember, but as Doc Seuss pointed out, her character never really “rose”, she seemed stagnant.

The Cubs have the lowest exit velocity and lowest batting average on curves and sliders.