Can I just say what a bunch of assholes to group up into order to make sure he DOESN’T achieve a full set of 32?

Mitchell: Mark. Can you wear a lab-coat on Monday? We have that huge press conference.

I would say it’s not getting bogged down. I think I’m devoting an appropriate amount of effort to the idea that if we disagree, we’ll accomplish more through respectful discussion than through sniping insults. We all need to be reminded of that from time-to-time. And this is my reminder to anyone who read what I…

First, yes. That is a reasoned argument. You explained yourself and didn’t insult anyone. Good job.

I disagree. I think you probably shouldn’t even attempt the “discussion” if that’s all of the effort you’re going to put into it. In fact, I’d also say that sad amount of effort actually hurts your argument by implying it couldn’t have been very important if all the effort you put into it was an insulting Nazi remark.

Really? So what are you hoping to achieve with that? Like, I get you’re upset with me, but why bother typing that? What do you think it will accomplish that made it worth the effort of typing that out and hitting “publish?”

OK. Then I hope you realize that to them, there’s also a line in their minds that if you were to cross it, then they would also be unbound by any limitations of treating you with respect either. That’s the world you’re helping creating here: you’re saying that it’s OK to not have to work out difference with other…

OK. I admit I’m having to fend off a rush of comments here and I may have mistaken your comment for someone else’s.

Mentally limited cretins rag on cops and ICE until they need help. ICE is doing a job that should have been done right along. Maybe this isn’t an issue in other nations because their immigra-tion laws are respected. For some reason, the U.S. isn’t supposed to have borders.

No. You have misconstrued my position. So here it is again: It would be better to either treat someone you disagree with with respect, or to simply ignore them. I believe what you did was worse the either of those options. You came across someone you disagreed with and then you yelled and insulted them giving no…

No. The OP argued to not abolish the ICE. They didn’t offer what to do instead. You seized on their rejection of abolishment and created a false “either/ or” situation where not abolishing the ICE was the only option to parroting propaganda. I don’t agree those are the only two choices.

Not a troll, and not stupid. So given that, how are you going to deal with me? That’s going to tell us a lot about you and what you truly believe about how people should be treated. If you simply insult me, then you undermine the entire idea of basic human dignity because you show that you only care about the dignity…

Here’s why: if you truly believe humans deserve basic human respect (something you’d probably use to argue AGAINST what Nazi’s preach and do) then that also should apply to how you treat people, even Nazi’s. Otherwise, you’re trying to have it both ways and say only people who agree with you about basic human value…

False dilemma. You’re arguing there’s only two choices here: Get rid of ICE or parrot government propaganda. I think you know there are other, less hyperbolic, options.

So because there’s a totalitarian country somewhere in the world, that makes it OK to shout down others instead of trying to reason, or simply ignore them? That’s quite a stretch.

Sure you can. But you probably don’t want to, because doing that would mean you’d have to admit they’re people too, deserving of some basic human respect. Instead, you’d rather follow them down the path of deciding someone else is sub-human and it’s fine to treat them that way.

That’s what people used to say about North Korea, yet here we are.

Why is he a Nazi punk?

“Fuck you Nazi punk.”

Abolish an agency that enforces the countries’ laws to keep the citizens safe. makes perfect sense.