As a young Redskins fan, I watched every second of that game. Every. Single. Second. It might literally be the worst professional football game I've ever seen. What a horrible viewing experience.
As a young Redskins fan, I watched every second of that game. Every. Single. Second. It might literally be the worst professional football game I've ever seen. What a horrible viewing experience.
There is some truth in what you're saying, but that truth can't be spoken here. You should know better. Look around.
I'm a huge fan of Frank's Red Hot, but even I have my limits. Putting it on, say, Cheerios would be pretty gross. Ditto any kind of dessert.
Yes, I agree, and that's always been the modern theory on fair-catch kicks: Specifically, that an NFL kicker, with no rush (or even his own linemen's butts) to worry about, could kick a low-trajectory kick that he could never attempt on a standard FG. Unfortunately, no one has been able to prove that theory correct…
I'm agreeing with you (I think).
No, that's right - I'm saying - where you're going to see this is when a team is punting from deep inside its own territory. That's exactly right. My point was that a fair-catch kick following a post-safety punt would require a massive blunder by the punter, because (1) the punt is happening at the 20, and (2)…
Unless the punter REALLY messes up, you'll never see this after a safety free kick in the NFL. Even with a mediocre kick, the other team's kicker would be looking at a 75-yard field goal. Most likely scenario is - Team A up by 1 or 2, punting out of own EZ with <10 seconds left. Team B fair catches at +/-40 after a…
Exactly.
I was just going to say - he has three or four GREAT impressions, but his material is bad. It's not that he's untalented, it's that he REALLY needs some good writers. He's like a great athlete who has no gameplan, and he just runs around in a circle on the field. You can see that he's got some speed and can cut…
The problem I'm currently having with my Android 3 is that it's just gotten really damn slow. If it were a laptop, I would have a clue how to help solve that, but, not knowing much about smartphones, I don't. When I say "slow," I mean that I sometimes press a touchscreen button, and just sit there for sometimes as…
Marry me.
+1
THE GLITTER IS CUM! (which they hate)
THIS: turns out, now that I'm grown up, the reason I didn't understand half the jokes was because they didn't make any goddamn sense.
No one should be shamed! We shouldn't judge.
Fair enough. I see your point.
FEEL THE BURN!
Yes, I am in favor of eliminating hate speech. It's just that I treat nearly all conservative ideas as "hate," by definition. Therefore, speech in support of those hateful ideas should be suppressed or punished.
The essence of what I'm saying is this: Views that don't meet the approval of the enlightened class should be verboten. He has an opinion on a social issue, but, if we decide that view is unacceptable, his speech should be subject to punishment (or at least an apology). This includes criticism of progressive-leaning…