As far as I can tell, nobody had sex, right? I haven't clicked on any of the links. Terry actually whipped out his penis and came on unwilling participants. Not the same thing at all.

Did universities stop charging application fees or what?

you clearly don't have any idea what Central Piedmont Community College looks like, either from student demographics or those of their security.

I never thought it would bother me until one of my favorite bars switched there bathroom to unisex. Three stalls in a unisex bathroom. I realized that I am NOT comfortable with that, being partially undressed behind a closed door with a heterosexual man I do not know, at a bar no less.

I don't know which women's bathrooms you've been in, but I would say that 99% of the ones which I have used have a space large enough to crawl through under the door, and gaps at the edges of the door and walls large enough to look through. I would *not* be comfortable with men wandering through. Most men would…

Yeah he is being quite offensive. I have lived in Mexico and have visited bout a dozen times. I am still very close to the family I lived with when I was there and they are amazing people and Mexico is an amazing country. It's just plain ignorance to describe it as such. Do you think he would be surprised to know…

It's best for my family for you to "donate" your TV and computer to me. When can I swing by to pick them up?

My brother had his credit rating destroyed by an illegal immigrant living near San Diego who had run up a ton of debt, written bad checks, and skipped out on apartment leases over a period of 4 years during which he was using fake documents and bank accounts registered under my brother's SSN. Even though the police…

Which joke, the show segment or the tweet? Because, as was explained pretty clearly, he didn't send the tweet, which was largely devoid of the context of the joke.

In general, weaponized liberal outrage is a devastating resource, and we must only use it for good.

Now I really want to put "SPITE" in the "for" line of a check.

It's a real tragedy, she reads like she was a very sweet woman, but let the fact that people stopped by to read about her and learn something nice about her personality be enough without making a bigger deal out of it.

Because the salient point here is that she was his girlfriend (or he was her boyfriend - however you want to look at it). His girlfriend sent him a text saying he scares her. That's the point of the article and of the text and of the relevance to the crime. The headline helps tell the story. " If the headline were:

Oh, you mean you haven't been studying??? If you want I can lend you my Victims of Hideous Crimes (TM) Flashcards. From the Sumerians to Millenials, we have got your hideous crimes covered. Now be a bastion of human decency, quit your job, kiss your loved ones goodbye and learn the 1 billion names of hideous crimes'…

There are those of us who haven't become aware of this news story yet (me, hi) and I think the current title is much more descriptive than just using her name. By using the word "girlfriend" there is an immediate connection between the two people. I suppose the author could have added her name, but that would make the…

Are we obligated by basic decency to learn the names of all victims of hideous crimes?

Are you always this hostile and judgmental? I've heard almost nothing of this story and simply said I didn't know her name. I'm not agreeing with you or disagreeing with you, just stating a fact. Perhaps you could try to do less mind reading and labeling?

Because people like me know who he is, know what happened, know he's on trial.. and still wouldn't recognize the victim's name. When one person is famous and the other is not I think it is completely acceptable.

Read what I said, then compare it to what you said, then analyze the difference.

I had no idea of her name.