Welcome to the idiocracy, where a scientific paper published in a well-respected peer-reviewed science journal is “political” but the scientifically-illiterate politician firing the paper writer over ideology... isn’t.

The NEJM presumably went over the funding again and again. Considering the NEJM rejects nearly all the manuscripts it is sent, I strongly doubt they let anything fishy pass through.

Well she managed to keep her legs closed without contracting an STI or becoming pregnant when she didn't want to so seriously why is it so hard for everyone else?

It’s one thing for an agency to provide data upon request. It’s quite another to be listed as a ‘co-author’ on a deeply flawed and highly political report

I feel bad for this guy who is being forced to retire because he uncovered the flaws in the system. I feel bad for the women in Texas (and other places) who don’t have access to the health care they need.