GTFO chicky

Erm, Clinton claimed Nancy Reagan started a nationwide conversation about AIDs when noone else would talk about it. That is literally, objectively a lie. That is what is being criticised.

No, this article points out that what Hillary said about Nancy Reagan starting a dialogue on AIDS prevention in America is, in fact, a bald-faced lie. It's not the least bit true in any way, shape, or form. It is the opposite of truth.

was she talking out of her ass and was just word salad-ing the fuck outta this interview? sure, probably.

No, it’s because she thinks she can scoop up some moderate Republican voters in the general election if Trump is the nominee. This is nothing more than dishonest, cynical pandering. Wait, that’s not true. It is something more. It's a flat-out, bald-faced lie.

That doesn’t mean you lie about people and say those who did great damage actually helped. That’s an insult to all who died of AIDS in the 80's and their relatives who lost them. So, that insensitivity and spoken untruth lies squarely on Hillary’s shoulders.

I can’t actually believe this. HRC stans are defending this. I am actually amazed.

There have gotta be about 978974654654654 ways to avoid “speaking ill of the dead” that don’t also posit the motherfucking Reagans as thought leaders on the AIDS epidemic. Gimme a break.

She literally could have talked about anything else though. Even D.A.R.E., which was an epic joke, certainly started the conversation about drugs much younger and made it a community issue not just a parental issue. Or you know, just being a nice lady or whatever. People can still pick apart that but at least it has…

is this satire

Wow. You are seriously defending this? There are a MILLION things she could have said about Reagan that are true. ‘Strong first lady, amazing courage during her husband’s assassination attempt’ and she went for this. How do you think you are progressive and spout this kind of stuff?

Has HRC ever done anything wrong in…

Me at this whole KK selfie, empowering, feminist, slut-shaming, crap. Everyone just shut up! And if Kim really is that freaking empowered, then she needs to just brush off the negative comments. Your stupid essay sounds so freaking shallow coming from you.

I think I just need a break from this website. I know there are people out there “slut-shaming” KK, which is not okay on any level. But a lot of people such as myself are just experiencing what someone on another thread appropriately called “kardashian fatigue.” Others have also pointed out the juxtaposition of…

KK wasn’t slut-shamed, she was attention-whored. There’s a difference.

Everyone involved.

I donno about embracing KK as some feminist ally. I think it’s okay for women to (thoughtfully) critique her use of nudity and sexuality - her ‘brand’ and wealth are very dependent on promoting super narrow standards of beauty, which are tied with having tons of money, opulence, being sexually available to powerful…

a) Kim looks amazing in that picture but we’ve seen if before, I’m not shocked and I don’t find it interesting

I don’t care about nudity, but I’m sick of the Kardashians. I need a break from them. Just for once, I ‘d like to indulge in some celebrity gossip that does not mention those people

Please. She’s not slut shaming. I think it is disingenuous to think that people are supposed to be celebrated every time they show the same naked body they’ve shown a dozen times already. Particularly when there is a commercial angle to it. Yes, yes. She’s got tits and ass. Good for her! But Bette’s right. It’s not…