Yeah, I get how breaks work dipshit. That’s not the issue. The issue is whether or not that is a reasonable way to treat human beings.

yeah you should read the article. and the artickes that were posted on gawker a few years ago. making employees work in 100° weather without access to water or breaks, and it being so bad they *hired an ambulance* to sit outside of the warehouse to care for workers who passed out, and then pressured workers who passed…

Wow, sounds great, and at $12hr you could almost pay utilities and eat if you lived there.

Environmentally controlled? Heat index of 102 inside.

High pay??? You can’t be serious.

I guess you missed the part where employees were timed when they went to the bathroom.

The breaks are not that long and the pay is not that high.

Let me guess, your work life has been shitty and you resent anyone fighting for anything better.

There’s “urgency”. And then there’s “We have to put your health at risk so we can keep a promise that we never should have made in the first place to consumers who think having to wait three days instead of two is a burden they cannot bear and live”.

Of course, it can be rather difficult to decide what’s a want and what’s a need, especially when trying to use the same scale for yourself and others, assess the soft “mental health” needs, or handle the poor scale language of children.