Yeah. I'm no the type to sell the consoles I love, even if they've been made redundant by another console's backward compatibility. If I didn't really love a console, I save the games and emulate the console.
martinthew
martinthew
Centenarians on my dad's side, but aneurysms are popular on my mom's side. I figure I'll die of an aneurysm at a hundred, and have planned my life accordingly.
Well, it got reported on Kotaku if that's any consolation. Pretty much everyone in the comments was tearing the YouTubers a new asshole. If anything, it's better that this story was reported on Kotaku, where it can promote discussion, as opposed to Jezebel where it can only confirm what most already know about…
The Vita doesn't cost even near $250 to manufacture, plus the cost of the memory cards which are many times more expensive than their non-Sony equivalent.
Like you just said, Nintendo builds their consoles around their peripherals and games. I'm sure if Nintendo meant for the Wii U to use more than one gamepad, they'd have boosted the console's power to support those extra screens.
The PS3 was selling at less than half its actual cost after the first price cut, so it wouldn't be an exaggeration to say that Sony's capable of pulling it off.
I'd think that'd drive the country further away from the gov't. When your country has been at war for 1700 years, it's a safe bet that the distopian, authoritarian governments are the only ones who want it to continue. Nukes aren't all that threatening when they happen on such frequent basis, and it wouldn't seem as…
The thing costs a ton, and the level of quality I want in games isn't there. Besides Little King's Story 2 and Gravity Rush, there's not much in the way of games that I desire. The games that I would want otherwise are ports of games that I've already played on my PS3.
What makes you think Nintendo didn't design the console's power around the desired peripherals, as opposed to budgeting the peripherals around the console's power?
It's not particularly last-gen though. There was never a sign from Nintendo that they were abandoning motion gaming. What's better than to add value to your next console by integrating the previous console's peripherals? It's even got the same name, but with a U at the end. It seems like Nintendo views their new…
You sure? A lot of the games shown seem to emphasize cooperation or competition between the one with the gamepad and the ones with the regular controllers.
Oh no, Bethesda. That is almost as bad as a cake reference at this point.
I doubt it's fully about what's most visually appealing, but what aspect of the games they most want to emphasize.
Merci Monsieur!
Heheheh, I didn't click through to the thread 'cuz I'm sworn off Reddit. Too distracting.
That was some weird imagery. If that's how writers perceive sex, I'm wondering who fucks the writers. Plus, I got a five out of ten, meaning that the male and female writers' sexual tendencies are equally unknown to me.
You'd think there'd be a bit of revolution going on if the populace was having such a shitty time of it. That's either a leering social statement or a broken part of the game.
Being hard of hearing has its benefits, sleeping easily being one of them. The only thing I cannot abide is light. From lamplight to moonlight, to the little diodes in the alarm clock, there is no sleep to be had with light.
Right now? Miramichi, NB, Canada.
You want backwards compatibility from two generations ago? Besides launch-model PS3s, I don't think there are consoles that have done that sort of thing.