You know the other “three cases” were 1) a woman who said he inappropriately kissed her at a party (university found him ‘not responsible’), 2) a woman who said he ‘inappropriately followed her upstairs at a party’ (university found him ‘not responsible’), and 3) a gay man who said he sexually assaulted him after this…

Every time Gawker fails to warn me that a link leads to Jezebel, I end up wondering what fucking insane universe I've fallen into in the comments. And then I look at the link and see "Jezebel.com" and realize what happened.

“ because there’s a bigger principle at stake here.”.....that is what is wrong with your entire argument. If it truly was a false accusation as your are positing then why should the wrongly accused suffer?

You should just let people shit all over your reputation and lie about you because of some bigger principle? What is the bigger principle here exactly?