marsyao--disqus
marsyao
marsyao--disqus

I know Kim and Jimmy clashed before such as cram pie fiasco), but this time is different, this time, by playing ignorance, she would have a big gain.
And the other example you gave is not same here, it would be more like that while you know as a absolutely true fact that someone you love murdered some guy so that you

By professional protocol, if she has slight doubt about this, she must inform her client, think about it. And she is not thing Chuck is probably right, she is absolutely believe Chuck is right, otherwise why she imply Jimmy should cover all of his track?

I call it is her "main motive" is because she would not want to discuss this with Jimmy, not even in private, instead she calmly imply Jimmy to cover his track, if her main motive is to not getting Jimmy in legal trouble, then why not telling him "I know what you did, please promise me not do it again" ? Because she

You do remember it eventually does not work so well for Mike in the Breaking Bad? and in this episode, he was also risking the safety of his family

her main motive is to keep Mesa Verde, otherwise she would not refuse to even discuss it with Jimmy afterward, otherwise she would risk Jimmy telling her the whole thing, then legally bond she would have to inform Mesa Verde and lost her account

No, it is not about "not put Jimmy in serious trouble", it is about not giving up her account

Yes, she knows Chuck was right, but admit it would mean let go of her big account, that is why she pretends not believing it

Am the only one see through why Kim stand by Jimmy despite the fact she knows what Chuck told her is true? Think about it, if she admits it, then, as Chuck told her, she would have to go to tell Kevin, which means she would have to give up this big account she was working so hard to get. She did it not for her