Find the A&E special "The Killing of Jon Benet Ramsey". It is much more in-depth and examines much more evidence.

Just because someone has extreme social anxiety and could possibly be on the autism spectrum does not make them a murderer! Ask yourself this: If his parents knew he murdered his sister would they have let him go for TWO interviews without an attorney present or without a court order? No they would not! Also: Why…

Are you a lawyer with 30+ years of practice? Well I am, and there are many, many reasons why Burke will win his case. BTW, I never, ever thought OJ Simpson was innocent!

First, a spider can spin another web in less than an hour if they are close by and still using the web. Second, the Ramsey's were out of their house all evening and the intruder could have gotten in and hid until they all went to bed with plenty of time to write a three page note, if his original intent was to kidnap…

Just off the top of my head: (1) the garrote was on her neck for a period of time that she was definitely alive… the evidence on the neck showed that it moved up a considerable distance causing severe bruising (2) there were small half-moon scrapes above the garrote marks showing that she was grabbing at the garrote…

First of all, until this "documentary" it was always considered an accident and was reported that JonBenet walked behind Burke as he was swinging the golf club. They used an obviously disgruntled former friend to "prove" their point that Burke was violent. Those types of accidents happen all the time. Please look…

Nope! And my two brothers were pretty violent, especially with each other, but they knew better than to harm me! My parents would have punished them and they knew it! As yourself these two questions: (1) If the parents knew that Burke had murdered his sister with the flashlight, why would they leave it out in…

If CBS had done a documentary that was "open-ended" and did not point to one person as the murderer, they would have a chance of winning, but they only noted the evidence that "proved" their theory and left out so much that contradicted it. Ask yourself these two questions: (1) Why wouldn't a parent rush their…

But it should matter to CBS, and they should be sued. I cannot believe that any reputable media outlet, much less a mainstream television network would produce a "documentary" that leads to one conclusion, much less one that points to a child who was never even considered a possible suspect. There was absolutely no…

You are truly sick. I am sure you meant "Natalie Wood", but you have to be sick to be so insensitive.

As a decent human being, you would want for the true murderer to be found. Any unsolved murder, means that there is possibly a murderer still out there and capable of doing the same thing again.

You are a sick, sick person. And not at all funny.

No this idiot was implying "Natalie Wood"… how insensitive!

It only takes a spider about an hour to replace a web. This is no evidence at all. I cannot believe that anyone would think that the parents would not just rush the child to the hospital in hopes that she was just in a coma, rather than do all this damage to her body. It is crazy thinking. It is crazy to think…

Look it up… easy to find. I don't do your work!

This "documentary" has only about 1/100th of the actual evidence. Clemente just summarily ignored all of the substantial evidence that there was an intruder, including that JonBenet had unknown male DNA under her fingernails that matched unknown male DNA from blood on her pants! Clemente ignored that it is…

No, there was an incident where JonBenet walked behind Burke as he was swinging the golf cub. No one else has ever said that was done in anger! That was not part of the original investigation, and was made up by the photographer because she is bitter because she was "cut off" for talking to reporters! She obviously…

They said there was feces… that could have been her own from poor toileting habits.. . Clemente is a jerk and was just trying to prove his own theory. He had no interest in presenting all the facts. They did not present any of the substantial evidence that there was actually an intruder. Clemente had one goal and…

If you believed the crap that they called an investigation, then you have not been following the case at all. There is credible evidence that there was an intruder.. this "documentary" left out so much evidence it was obvious they were doing it maliciously. It was clearly evident that the child was tazed. It was…

I am so glad to hear this. It was the worst investigateve documentary I have seen on it. I think they should directly sue former FBI agent Clemente as well! He led the whole thing and any time anyone on the team mentioned anything that was contrary to his theory that 9 year old Burke did it, he just dismissed it,…