Good points, but I don’t think they’re mutually exclusive. One of Trump’s doofy sons did say that his sister was “too strong” to be sexually harassed.

You can criticize someone’s views without making fun of charactaristics they have only due to their poverty.

You’re the one who still wont admit that punching down is, definitionally, a bad thing.

Yawn. That is such a sad, transparent effort at gas-lighting. Really doing a lot to make me think you’re something other than a naive punk.

Punching down is always wrong. It is.

1) Yes, those things are disrespectful. So are the very audible things in the video. Surely you aren’t trying to argue that because a higher level of dissect existed once, nothing below can ever be disrespect...

1) This is a fucking idiotic summation of what happened. It doesn’t make him correct for all time, but it SHOULD earn him the respect of all right thinking Americans. It’s amusing that you whine about the treatment of the fucking idiots hurling their poo around the convention, but cannot see the utter disgrace of the…

Don’t fucking shout over a man who was beaten by police fighting for his right to vote and then demand that people treat you with kid gloves.

I’ve got serious problems with some of her policy positions (almost entirely foreign policy), but fuck, you have to respect her. She is badass. I cannot think of another person in America who could deal with what she has dealt with and still succeed so amazingly.

Right...but she was clear about that. She was criticizing those 25% who were acting like assholes at the convention.

Except for the poll they just showed with a quarter of those folks going somewhere other than Hillary...

Years from now we will marvel as we ask ourselves, “How were there two Raptors on Team USA?”

Good call. I do like the most recent one’s angry face, though.

Agree.

You’re crazy, and I love it.

Feelings are often misleading.

Well, makes sense that someone who felt it was important to advance the idiotic “all lives matter” shit would think the earth was flat. Consistent level of intellectual engagement.

Focus vs. exclusion, bruh.

Haha, so you think a potentially higher rate of being accosted by police helps your case? And, of course, you haven’t adjusted your dick dumb stats to account for that rate. You just gave raw numbers, which are misleading even based on your counterargument, irrelevant as it is.

Derp.