markadmsdds
MARKADMSDDS
markadmsdds

If some American wants to go marry an ISIS terrorist I say good riddance. Revoke their passports and let them go one a one-way ticket.

"DEAR GOD SOMEONE SAVE MEEEE!"

why dont you?

No, but "crying wolf" does. You stretching to make things about racism when they are not make it harder for the rest of us to acknowledge actual racism when it happens, e.g., stop-and-frisk, no fly-lists, Trayvon Martin, drug laws. A drunk lady on a porch does not have to be about racism.

If you don't get an invite and you are planning on coming let me or [redacted]

indeed. And if we were to approach this with the goal of less biased rules, lets compare two cases:
(1) A person, of any color, is walking down the street minding his own business. Another person, because of the first persons's race/dress, etc., stalks and attacks that persons, starting a dispute the leads to the first

Then you are 100% hurting the cause of equality with this outlook on life.

Leave it to white people to make someone who IS A POC a "racist" because they don't buy into their same "everything-is-about-race" worldview. Good luck making it through life as an insufferable self-righteous prick

Or not

THANK YOU FOR THIS. Making these cases all about "racism in america" only serve to perpetuate inequality by making POC "victims of the system" who need a different set of rules.

Wait, was she not drunk?

"Ohh nooo, thats too bad Landon, well be sure to—-"/gets distracted with new players that are good

Can we talk about the Garfunkel and Oates ads and how AWFUL that show is? I am all for supporting a fellow comedienne, but would it kill someone to give Emily Heller or someone actually funny a show?

yeah i think i'm neutral-scalia now after re-thinking it

shes actually kind of hot

18 Underrated Bears:

what if scalia isn't hateful and just disagrees about the role of the courts in this conversation? and thats why he and RBG are friends...1!!???

thanks stop and frisk?

He spoke to my law school and he was like Satan, tempting me with logical, reasonable arguments w/r/t constitutional interpretation.

Historically socialism in its purest sense has been bad for minorities or those who don't fit the communal "model." Central planners who have control over every economic aspect of our life will eventually influence our personal lives, and if, for instance, it becomes in the national interest to raise the birth rate,