The only thing this guy has to gain if he’s lying about how actually terrible this thing is is that he’s convincing more people to suffer with him. Not exactly compelling evidence.

I refuse to accept journalism critiques from someone who doesn’t know their you’re/yours.

Just picked up my Model 3. Maybe I got lucky but mine has no panel gaps. There was one misaligned chrome piece but I have a service appointment to fix it. The rest of the car is simply amazing. Once more get on the road, the public will clamor for this car.

Right, but it doesn’t affect the thing in my hands. People are so eager to knock Tesla down a notch that they’re crying foul over shit that wouldn’t matter even if it were blatantly foul. It’s called full disclosure, and he didn’t say he’s a shareholder, which people actually do.

Instead we now hear snark from the comment section by people who have no connection to the issue at hand...

You mean the established scientific method of determining difference using a baseline, control and documenting observable differences?

Awww, stupid idiot can’t tell sarcasm....

No offense, but you sound as much of a putz as Bigger Putz. Give it a rest.

Holy shit... are you serious right now?

Yep those evil liberals trying to KILL PEOPLE by stopping mass shootings from happening and giving people access to healthcare. So, so evil. The obvious solution is to make sure rich people have more money, only THEN will we save humanity!

They have studied those phenomenons. The largest problem we have right now are greenhouse gas emissions and per-capita, Cities are actually more efficient as human dwellings than rural development.

In other words, the carbon footprint per person living in an urban environment is much less than the carbon footprint per…

Ah, the old “dilution is the solution to pollution” gambit. Generally true from a human health impacts standpoint, but not really valid when considering a closed system (i.e. the earth and global climate change) or semi-closed system (like dense industrial or urban areas). OP was being purposefully snarky, but you’re…

According to the times article, it was 1000/yr in 2010, and has grown to 10k+. Thats the whole industry, dunno if more than these guys are doing it. They are making a killing on this, thanks to their campaign contributions and connections. Fuck our lives, right?

Exhaust fumes kill you by suffocation (N2, CO2, CO displacing breathable O2 in the air), not by polluting you to death with what is typically considered “pollutants”. Not that I disagree with your sentiment here, but c’mon. India is the best argument for emissions regulation that exists.

[Citation needed]

“That bill failed, but after the election of Mr. Trump, she turned to Mr. Pruitt to carve out an exemption to the new rule — scheduled to take effect last month — and presented him with the study from Tennessee Tech.”

YES BUT IT WAS FREEZING HERE AND THE ARCTIC DOES NOT EXISTS

Pictured: truck expert

Trump/GOP is backed by the climate change denial aka the fossil fuel lobby, who want to have the entire world stick its head in the sand re: the dangers of pollution and emissions, so they can continue to make profit while using our planet as their free sewer.

“I don’t know why anyone would want to kill all these jobs. It does not make any sense.”