How is "little girl" better or worse than "when I was little"?

Being well-meaning doesn't mean you get to do what you want. Don't grab people. Especially children.

When did people not "demand you vote for this person or that person"? And, last I checked, you still "get" to keep it to yourself. Unless someone is forcing you to come online and whine about it?

Stopped clock.

You're outraged because the "left" is mocking the right's candidate for president? What were you expecting from Trump's opponents and critics? Panegyrics?

Yeah. You're going to "sue" foreign tourists. In Brazil. Sounds effective.

So, if someone bashed down your door and pee'd on your stuff, they're the victim? Because your security guard confronted them. Ok.

So your counter argument is he's not a racist but instead is a bigot?

Ovid paraphrase: To be loved, you must first be loveable.

I think it's more that his standard for "effort and sacrifice" is comically low. "I have basic hygiene! I consider myself nice! I own a car! Why won't these stupid girls just love me?"

Well "similar circumstances" could mean that. Or it could mean "if the facts of the case were slightly different" or "if we had slightly more evidence." The word "circumstances" covers all of those situations. Indeed, the word is so vague that your insistence that it must mean she's "royalty" is, as I said, silly.

You don't really understand how the law works do you? In numerous potential cases there will be some evidence that a law was violated. The standard of guilt however is "beyond a reasonable doubt" meaning that a prosecutor needs to believe that there is enough evidence such that it would be possible to prove the case.…

Whether she violated a law is "literally" a matter of opinion? What does that mean?

Who was greater? Lincoln maybe?

Every new one seems to add victims. I'm, sure, by the end of the night, Bill will truly be history's greatest monster.

Your implication that this kind of conversation is normal for "men" says more about you than it does about men.

I think you're underestimating how toxic it is to be seen as property. It warps every aspect of your life. And I don't think you realize how undervalued a slave's life was. It's not like plantation owners built crypts for their slaves either.

I think the flashes of greatness make people think/see that there's potential for a great show that's constantly being squandered. I can see how that would be frustrating.

All women artists secretly banding together on YouTube in order to achieve an entertainment revolution/coup is "plausible" to you?

So the problem is women just aren't giving him the chance to make their shows? They are inexplicably hoarding their ideas rather than pitch them? Because why? Female artists dislike getting a salary?