Yes, because you don't understand why your emendation is a mess with regard to its direct vs. indirect objects. I'll give you time to do some googling and then find a way to evade the point entirely.

Once again, now that I've pinned you into a position where you're obviously wrong, you conveniently change topics. Apparently you assume that if you ignore everything you just said, we will too.

Noticed your failure to support your flawed emendation. Seems to be your pattern.

Wrong, in that the show had already laid sufficient groundwork for these themes to be understood by the audience and so didn't need the overt explanation.

"State of nature" refers to the theoretical construct of pre-social man, and has nothing to do with "kill everyone".

I'm quite content with my proficient use of the English language, and it provides a fine contrast to your "asymmetrically feel vulnerable," which is thorough nonsense that is completely at sea on its direct vs. indirect objects; and, perhaps most importantly, not at all accurate in discussing terrorism.

And I'm saying that "laziness" is a poor choice of words. It's not that the writers bungled a fact-check or failed to write a crucial scene. They over-explained an implicit thematic arc. If anything, they did more than they should have in adding all of that expository dialogue.

…

As above, please start reading whole sentences. The most efficient solution is efficient regardless of Batman's personal morals.

Try again. Adverbs are hard.

Quite so, and a good example of why it's pointless to try to stage a substantive debate on a fictional instance: unlike real life, in a story like 'Jessica Jones' it is possible to know all of the unknowns and reduce the situation to a precise calculus.

Simpson's labeling of Kilgrave as "terrorist" makes complete sense in the context of the show. Terrorism by definition instills fear by making people feel asymetrically vulnerable. It takes one's power away. The writers do a great job of distinguishing how Jessica and Simpsons respond to being terrorized. Their…

The Alex/Ruben storyline is disgusting and should creep people out. If you need convincing, a simple thought experiment: swap the genders. Now it's a guy in college using a 16 year-old girl as an ego boost, seasoned with a constant stream of "you're not good enough for me."

It was quite clever to cast Opal as the agent provocateur, since she's a character we're already somewhat ambivalent about. Because frankly, Robertson has a point. He saw to the education and position of Algie as a world-class surgeon in concert with funding a hospital, while Opal has… made snippy comments like it's…

Can I go on record as not really understanding the father's plan? While 'killing those boys proves your worth' makes sense in the abstract, his plan essentially required her to kill three childhood friends and in so doing antagonize their powerful families, making the girl's future infinitely harder whenever she…

I accuse the GPS in Chekov's Cellphone.

"Fortress of Grimmitude"

"The underwater monster-dodging, the pod-racing, and the simultaneous
climactic stand-offs in space and on the ground are all as good or
better than anything that had come before in a Star Wars film."

I don't know if that's totally fair. The Grimmlins gave HexenBitsie every opportunity to step back from the brink, and she responded by brutalizing them and getting Nick's neighbors and mother killed. Now, you can argue that she's not herself, but if that's the case then the Juliette they knew was already gone.…

I think your understanding of the word 'hypocrisy' is confused.