Hahahaha, yikes! You're scary! I am in fact a real-ass lawyer (but not a real ass lawyer; I have no pending suits seeking the truth about Coco or Kim K)! I'd regale you with the highlights of my sparkling, scented resume but you seem to have woken up on the wrong side of the bridge you reside under. In fact, my…

It would work by a court order saying "Do not get an abortion", violation of which subjects you to civil contempt of court and/or criminal charges. "Restraining order" means anything that prevents a person from taking an action, not just preventing a person from contacting someone or whatever.

I think part of the problem is that the show easily reads as a vehicle for Lena Dunham's ego (Hannah is, despite her faults, clearly the character we are supposed to like, admire, and identify with most), so an episode devoted to how much an insanely handsome and successful person wants to have sex with her for two…

Uh, it should look comfy. They're PAJAMAS.

Every time I see Rooney Mara at an event I just get the urge to scream "GO HOME!!" She just looks so unbearably miserable.

Hahaha, yup. "There are some people who didn't go to college and are really rich!" (Most of them dropped out of insanely elite institutions and therefore had the connections and at least some of the education of graduates of such elite institutions.) "Also, some people who did graduate from college have bad jobs, or…

Color me shocked that kids in Wilton, one of the most affluent towns in the country with a median income that I'd bet is at or near $200K, can't afford college. Also probably less heroic than just having a normal summer job, since the seed money was probably from The Bank of Mom and Dad.

No 1st Amendment issue at all. As a neutral law of general applicability having only an indirect and unintentional effect on religious expression, it can lawfully suppress that expression. In the famous case setting that standard, a Native American was lawfully fired from her job for testing positive for peyote use,…

Rule exists. Rule is kind of stupid, but applied uniformly. Person aware of rule chooses to break the rule, believing it is stupid, and knowing likely consequences. Predicted consequences for breaking rule result. ——> OUTRAGE!!!!

I think you ignored the "as a result" portion of my response. The article presents as a problem the fact that a male celebrity admits being chubby when he was a child and, despite that admission about the distant past, is not photographed in the present day unclothed. The implication is that the lack of a "Look at me…

Uh, it sounds like he was fat IN HIGH SCHOOL, i.e. like 15 years ago? Show me the article in which an actress claims to have been a chubby loser in high school (spoiler: ALL OF THEM!) and, as a result, is presented nude for inspection and approval decades later (spoiler: NONE OF THEM!).

Isn't it possible that these are just extremely canny little shits who got caught up in some seriously misguided group behavior? The redemption/society is like so bad narrative Prugo spins just rings so false, but apparently you buy it. Kudos on using the Hannah Montana theme as a motif, though!