manvshumanity
manVsHumanity
manvshumanity

I agree with that. More if she stays on indefinitely to make money there, not if she makes a plan to leave and have platform for her voice. A few weeks to make said plan makes sense.

Two songs make me think of bad things: First, my friend made a mix CD and I was listening to ‘Hey Jude’ when the first tower was hit by a plane at 9/11. Second, when my wife and I were confirming she had a miscarriage at the hospital, the nurse had the radio on (??) and ‘Ain’t it Fun’ by Paramore was playing. I liked

My only hope is that memory recall is actually really bad in most people and the timing of events are flipped in her head. Comment, him pissed and some words said, then slapping after everyone left. Not that the events are inaccurate at all, just the order. At some point, memories become you remember the memory, which

Well, with that statement, you lose the argument that ESPN is allowed to make financial based decisions as much as she is, which then is a slope to losing the argument that ESPN is fully within their right to reprimand her.

Alright, someone please learn me, honestly. Once she enters the realm of spreading a message that boycotting the Cowboys is the best way to get things done, which I also completely agree with, she is now affecting her employers business. ESPN airs football games, including the Cowboys. People boycott them, ratings go

Why don’t you carry bear spray everywhere, then, if you are so worried about hypothetical situations? You scared prick.

I call myself white constantly. Recently, in the context of saying how easy it is to slip into complacency as a white man. Being pissed at the inequalities suck, is soul crushing, and it’s always so close and tempting to just stop caring, because I’m a middle-class white dude with an Irish last name. Shit’s going to

Trickle down economics are so stupid. Rich guy will have more money so he will spend it to hire people he didn’t need 6 months ago...wait, that sounds like bullshit. It should be trickle UP and ACROSS economics. Give an extra $5 million to a person with $100 million, there’s no incentive to spend that. Take that $5

I hate Facebook based on everyone definitely shouldn’t have a platform to speak. But man, it’s fucking awesome at getting a ton of asshole’s out in the open. (insert porn website joke)

To be fair, got in arguments with some lawyer friends yesterday over it. ‘Should’ is not a directive and non-binding wording. ‘Shall’ would mean it has to be followed. And apparently, ‘shall’ may not be good enough anymore, it might be ‘must’.

Gotta keep your dreams realistic.

You must be fun at parties.

But, these videos are not live streamed, right? He edited them. And he kept it in. I bet if you slipped and said that, had to chance to edit it out, you would.

Louis CK:

We can disagree on where she is at, definitely. The main problem is we are seeing his point of view of the situation, without seeing hers, and then have to make our own personal judgements on what the situation is. Who knows where they are really at. If he is on reddit looking for answers, there are fundamental

My point was a full fact. Not just a one sentence. If you disregard their opinion then are the fool for ignoring them, then there is no respect. If you don’t listen to them, are the fool, then accept the blame, the respect is still present.

Oh yeah! There’s other things going on. I definitely do not always agree and and adhere to my wife’s opinion, or vice versa. But but when it goes south when we stick to it, we don’t blame each other for for own pour judgment. And this is clearly a case of wrong/right. Don’t use random fish raw. Most spouse

I disagree. The wife in this scenario completely disregarded his opinion. That doesn’t mean he does not love her enough. That means she doesn’t love him enough to respect his opinion.

But, at the end of the day, that means she doesn’t respect his opinion. If you tell your SO something, and they completely disregard it, there’s a complete lack of appreciation for them. If that’s the case, the partnership is not equal, and one should not bear the responsibility of the other at that point. The other